* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• STAR CLOVERS: Treking into the 4-H future
• 2010 HOOPS CHALLENGE: Play for the glory
• VIDEO: Jogger killed by plane
• STUDY: Too many invasive tests being given
• PATH TO THE DRAFT: Diary of Ricky Sapp

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Fix education law to help high-schoolers

 Tuesday, July 10, 2007

1 comment(s) | Default | Large

ISSUE: No Child Left Behind

OUR VIEW: Federal education law in need of repair for high-schoolers

The Bush administration's No Child Left Behind initiative has never been very popular with educators. Now comes ample reason in a state such as South Carolina to look for alternatives.

Whether one accepts the most liberal or conservative estimates of the number of high school students graduating on time in South Carolina, the fact remains that nearly half do not.

As Congress considers changes in the No Child Left Behind law, the focus should be on recognizing the unmet needs of high school students. Federal neglect of secondary schools is described in a new policy brief, "In Need of Improvement: NCLB and High Schools,'' from the Alliance for Excellent Education.

"While well-intentioned," states Bob Wise, president of the Alliance for Excellent Education and former governor of West Virginia, "the current NCLB simply does not address the dropout problem and permits far too many students to finish high school without adequate preparation for college or the modern work force." Nationally, 70 percent of high school students entering ninth grade do not graduate within four years.

While the existing NCLB focuses on improving outcomes for students in kindergarten through eighth grade, In Need of Improvement: NCLB and High Schools points out that high schools do not receive the attention and investment needed to support their students' continuing academic success.  South Carolina high school students are shortchanged by the existing NCLB because:

* Only a small percentage of high school students are actually covered by federal Title I funding, leaving far too many high schools without the requirements or resources to implement improvement strategies.

* NCLB holds schools accountable for test scores, but does not effectively hold high schools accountable for whether their students actually graduate.

* Seventy-five percent of South Carolina's eighth-graders read below a proficient level, yet there is no federal effort to improve reading and comprehension in middle and high school as there is in grades K-3.

* The limited tools NCLB provides to improve low-performing schools reflect neither research nor best practice and are not effective for high school reform.

Wise continues, "The present NCLB does not effectively reach high schools, and too many children are being left behind by the ninth grade. With the law up for renewal this year, this is the time to build on the ideals of ‘no child left behind' and pass legislation that will lead the nation toward 'every child a graduate.'"

Instead of what the brief calls "shortsighted proposals" that merely extend testing requirements to high schools or simply reserve portions of current funding streams for high schools, the alliance calls on Congress to reauthorize NCLB with a "a systemic solution that reflects all that is known about improving high schools from research and best practice."

As Wise concludes: "Research and best practice have demonstrated that there is no excuse for failing to address the needs of our high school students.''

In Need of Improvement: NCLB and High Schools is available at: http://www.all4ed.org/publications/NCLB_HighSchools.pdf .

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
1 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

pedingsgang wrote on Jul 10, 2007 5:37 PM:

" I am not a fan of NCLB because I feel the long arm of the federal government reaching into our homes and lives. However, I do see the need for national standards and a way to measure these standards, i.e. a high school diploma from South Carolina should be "equivalent" to a high school diploma from any other state in the Union. Presently, we all know this is not the case in secondary or college education. A B.S. in Nursing is not equivalent for all R.N.s who have passed the NCLEX (national exam). But we must start somewhere to ensure quality of education, and what better place than, as Julie Andrews would say, than at the very beginning. It would stand to reason that as the children who are now part of NCLB are progressing into the higher grade levels, their success will follow them. Has the federal government though made any provisions for the children who will not be able to meet the standards? As hopeful as I might be that there would be no such problem, my rose-colored glasses slid down momentarily, and I realize that all children may not reach the goals. So, what is Plan B? Surely, this should be a priority. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More Opinion