* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Fired Norway Chief says hearing denied

By T&D Staff  Wednesday, July 11, 2007

12 comment(s) | Default | Large

NORWAY - Ex-Norway Mayor Rose Dukes said Tuesday that former police chief James Preacher did everything in his power to defeat her during a 2005 re-election bid.

Dukes, after 12 years in office, lost the vote to Mayor Brad Fogle, who this past week fired Preacher. In 2005, Dukes and Preacher were at odds publicly after the chief called for an outside audit of traffic tickets he said were missing.

Dukes also said she and Preacher had other disagreements during her last year as mayor. While she claims to harbor no ill will, she says he projected himself into non-police situations in the town over the years.

"Sometimes it creates bad publicity," she said.

Preacher's time as police chief was a mixture of good and bad things, Dukes said. "Sometimes the bad outweighs the good."

"On Thursday of last week, Preacher was fired by Fogle via a letter. Reasons included that Preacher, on numerous occasions, insulted former and current town employees, including Dukes."

"The next day, Preacher requested a hearing to contest the firing. The chief said Tuesday he has been notified by the mayor there will be no hearing, with Fogle contending it is not legally required."

"Preacher indicated he will pursue the matter and plans to speak out about issues impacting his former position and the town. He said the situation with Dukes "is what this is all about."

"It's one of the things he fired me over."

Town council members Geraldine Bell, Emma Reed and William Binnicker on Tuesday declined comment on the situation.

Although 200 people rallied Monday night in a show of support for Preacher, some in the community have a different sentiment. While nobody interviewed at Monday's rally shared negative reflections of Preacher, comments posted on the Times and Democrat Web site paint a different picture of the 17-year tenure of Preacher as the Norway police chief.

TheTandD.com allows comments in response to stories. They are posted under a screen name, which the user must choose and register. The name can be the writer's real one.

Preacher responded: "Most of them are hiding behind the Web site. It's kind of cheap. It shows the mentality of those people. If they are sincere, put your name on it. I think my reputation speaks for itself."

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
12 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

fhsmct wrote on Jul 15, 2007 6:28 AM:

" Comments and/or the man be what they & he may, he still deserves due process and the benefit of a fair, impartial (well, as impartial as can possibly be when it involves human beings) hearing. If the full local legislative body did not duly convene and if some members were left out of the process (as at least one has pubically stated was the case(, then the man has a legit gripe. The sunshine laws exist for a reason. Even with their existance, one would be nieve(sp) to think that some back room barter doesn't take place but, in this instance, it's far and away blatantly well over the line . . . "

lmbryant wrote on Jul 14, 2007 11:53 AM:

" Who can prove that the so called hench-people put the sings up? The Mayor could have had that done. As for as Jime Preacher being a bully that is not so. It's like this show respect and you will get respect. Do as you are asked and everything will be all right. I like Jim Preacher he has helped me a lot, and I am sure he has helped a lot of other people as well. "

norwaylifetimeresident wrote on Jul 11, 2007 8:51 PM:

" HOORAY!! TO LEWIS GIVENS AND JAKE JACOBS FOR HAVING THE GUTS TO SPEAK THE TRUTH. I KNOW ALL YOU FOLKS ARE SCARED OF PEACHER INCLUDING MYSELF THAT HE WILL GET BACK INTO OFFICE AND BULLY US AGAIN. THIS IS SHAMEFULL. THANK YOU TIMES AND DEMOCRAT FOR FINALLY SHOWING ANOTHER SIDE. I MAY CONTINUE MY SUBSCRIPTION TO YOUR PAPER. "

HONEST NORWEGIAN wrote on Jul 11, 2007 5:10 PM:

" Now do you really want to see Chuck Blake as the mayor of our town? I think our town needs to forget about the ex-chief of police and move forward. Just how many people want Jim Preacher back? Did Mr. Perry take a poll of IN TOWN residents? If he is going by the number of people that turned out at the rally the media cannot even get the correct number! The TV says a little over 100 and the T and D said 200. Were they counting just adults that lived in town or were they counting the children as well? It is so shameful that people bring up the past of Mayor Fogle as a TEENAGER. Will that change the outcome of what has happened? Many people know Mayor fogle's past as a teenager and know the man he is today. What is more important? "

confisussum wrote on Jul 11, 2007 1:43 PM:

" My question to Mr. Preacher is, does it change the truthfulness of a post, if no name is attached? I believe it is just what ATL has suggested, he wants names so that he may exact revenge. It was his decision try this in the court of public opinion. That strategy may well backfire. A prime example of his vengeful nature are the signs that were posted, and the cross burning that was organized and attended by non-residents. "

B.PERRY wrote on Jul 11, 2007 12:57 PM:

" :leave the man alone .we are all not perfect.give him another chance.if it takes making CHUCK BLAKE THE MAYOR TO GET HIM BACK THAN . DO IT.THE TOWN WANTS PREACHER. THANKS ,BENNIE PERRY "

ATL wrote on Jul 11, 2007 11:36 AM:

" Most of the people attending the rally in support dont even live within the town limits. "

ATL wrote on Jul 11, 2007 11:35 AM:

" [quote]Preacher responded: "Most of them are hiding behind the Web site. It's kind of cheap. It shows the mentality of those people. If they are sincere, put your name on it. I think my reputation speaks for itself."[/quote] This is the real Preacher. Of Course he want's to see the names so he can terrorize them. Once again, he is a big bully. "

Home owner wrote on Jul 11, 2007 5:38 AM:

" Why not put a name on the comment. Why dont you take a poll on line and see what his approval rating is. And the reason I dont put a name on it is because the nut we are talking about is dangerous! And the last thing I need is to be wrapped up in that mess. See it used to be a 50/50 approval in town for Jim. Thats how he survived for so long as chief. Now it is a 70/30 and he no longer has the support. Burned to many bridges! "

over&out wrote on Jul 11, 2007 2:49 AM:

" preacher, you just a nasty person you talk to some people like they are a dog. to me you could have none better with your mouth. it's ok now god see it all and he fix it thanks to the mayor. "

TheTruth wrote on Jul 11, 2007 2:34 AM:

" Beleive what i say! Mayor Brad may have denied Jim Preacher of his chance of getting his job back but the people of Norway will know TheTruth. Let everyone know that Preacher has saved Brad Fogle so many times that it is ridiculous. I wish the Mayor well but TheTruth will come out! "

o8753 wrote on Jul 10, 2007 9:27 PM:

" Big Jim talks about hiding. Why did his hench-people put up the negative signs about the Mayor in the middle of night? "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News