* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• STAR CLOVERS: Treking into the 4-H future
• 2010 HOOPS CHALLENGE: Play for the glory
• VIDEO: Jogger killed by plane
• STUDY: Too many invasive tests being given
• PATH TO THE DRAFT: Diary of Ricky Sapp

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Matthews unveils Clinton plan to make higher education more accessible

By GENE ZALESKI, T&D Staff Writer  Friday, October 12, 2007

9 comment(s) | Default | Large

Increasing a tuition tax credit, increasing Pell grants and simplifying the student aid process are a few of the proposals Democratic presidential candidate U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton campaign officials unveiled Thursday morning as part of her effort to make college more affordable and accessible.

Sen. John Matthews, a state co-chair of the Clinton presidential campaign, presented Clinton's educational plan during a press conference held on the s.jpg of Claflin University's Tingley Memorial Hall.

Speaking to about 20 students gathered behind him, Matthews stressed the impact Clinton's plan would have on them and thousands of other college students.

"If we can reduce your cost to go to college, more of our children will have access and all of us will be better off," Matthews said. "This plan is intended to make sure that lower income students have a chance to compete in this knowledge-based economy by getting a college degree and reducing your burden when you get out of college. We are trying to create access to higher education whether it is four year or two year, whether public or private. This plan will cover all that."

Matthews said while they do not have debt now, it will be coming.

"I can promise you the day you graduate you will begin to get your bills," he said. "Hillary's plan offers financial relief and the opportunity for a higher education, a better paying job and a higher standard of living to tens of thousands of South Carolina families and young people struggling to come up with the money for college."

Matthews told the students at the Historically Black College and University the Clinton plan would especially help African Americans who already have the lowest college graduation rate of any racial or ethnic group.

Matthews said one of the reasons for the low graduation rate is the rising cost of pursuing a higher degree.

Citing a 2006 College Board study, Matthews said over the last five years the cost of tuition and fees for four-year public institutions has increased 35 percent. For private institutions, tuition and fees rose 11 percent.

And, the importance of African Americans going to college is paramount because a college education is a key to economic success, Matthews said.

He said African American men with college degrees earn about $16,000 more than those with a high school diploma, and African American females with a college education earn about $21,000 more.

Under Clinton's plan the proposal is to:

* Increase the Hope tax credit from the current $1,650 to $3,500, with the new credit being partially refundable in order to increase its value to low-income individuals. Taxpayers will be able to claim 100 percent of the first $1,000 of college expenses and 50 percent of the next $5,000 under this new credit.

* Increase the maximum Pell Grant through annual adjustments following along the passage of The College Cost Reduction Act. The CCRA increased the Pell Grant $4,800 for the 2008-2009 year.

Clinton said the median income of Pell Grant recipients was $17,692 in 2003-04, compared with $55,287 for all other undergraduates. She said when the Pell Grant was implemented, it covered 99 percent of the full cost of a two-year college, 77 percent at a four-year public college and 36 percent of a private college. Today, she said it has fallen to half that (62 percent, 36 percent, and 15 percent, respectively).

Clinton said increasing Pell grants would particularly benefit African Americans.

Citing statistics from the National Center for Education Statistics, Clinton says for the 2003-2004 academic year, 89 percent of full-time African-American undergraduate students received financial aid and, on average, each received $10,500.

* Reduce the red tape in financial aid. Clinton proposes to allow people to pay for financial aid by checking a box on their income tax return.

Upon checking that box, individuals will receive a letter from the Department of Education with a coupon showing the amount of federal aid - grants and loans - to which they are entitled.

Clinton says the current (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) is longer and more complicated than the typical tax return. The 1040EZ has one-third of the FAFSA's questions and one fifth of its pages.

As proposed, Clinton's plan will cost an estimated $8 billion annually.

She says the plan will be financed without increasing the deficit by eliminating the guaranteed student loan program and allocating a portion of the savings from freezing the estate tax at $7 million per couple. Clinton says freezing the estate tax at $7 million per couple will have no effect on 99.7 percent of estates except for the wealthiest.

Clinton, while not in attendance at the Orangeburg event, did issue a prepared statement for the unveiling of her proposal.

"I believe that college shouldn't just be a privilege for the wealthy - but an opportunity for anyone with the talent, determination and ambition to learn," she said. "And I believe that every American should have access to lifelong learning opportunities - from apprenticeships, to community college, to the most select four-year institutions."

Clinton said the "tax credit is at the heart" of her plan and the "key to unlocking the doors of higher education" and "unleashing the power of the American economy.'

During the question-and-answer session, Lakisha Lockhart, a Claflin University senior philosophy and religion major, asked the only question related to the source of funding of the $250 million Graduation Fund and the $10,000 in the Education Award.

"It would be federal money," Matthews said. "It would be a refundable tax credit so anybody who meets the criteria ... can use (it) towards going to higher education. If you don't have a tax obligation, then the fund will take care of that. So all students will have the same access."

Matthews said the program is nationally based and would cover both in-state and out-of-state students.

Following the conference, Lockhart said while she is still undecided on who she is going to vote for in the 2008 election, she is fully supportive of Clinton's plan.

Lockhart says she attended the press conference because she plans to attend Boston University to obtain her doctorate in pastoral psychology. Tuition costs will directly impact her.

"This affects me," she said. "This affects how much I will be paying back to the school and how much my children are going to pay."

Further, Lockhart said, as a college student, the knowledge of debt can often be an intimidating experience.

"No one wants to leave college in debt," she said. "No one wants to look back and have $81,000 that they have to pay in every 60 months. I know a lot of people coming up that do have debt. That is a burden they will have while going through graduate school, while they are working. That will be the main thing they are thinking about -- 'I will have to pay this off, I will have to pay this off.' This is not what we want. We want to be debt free, and this is a plan that will actually help us."

T&D Staff Writer Gene Zaleski can be reached by e-mail gzaleski@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-533-5551. Discuss this and other stories online at TheTandD.com.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
9 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

goo1261 wrote on Oct 20, 2007 11:15 PM:

" i love the maturity level. so u all decided to resort back to being 5 yr olds calling each other names? "right wing extremists" and "left wing liberals" whatever. a democrat will be elected simply b/c a republican was president when we went to war. all u think about is whether those running for the office is republican or democrat. thats why we have so many problems in the government now. since u all know EXACTLY how to run the government, why dont YOU run for president? maybe name-calling will get u in. its very mature. oh, and mycuzinloraine is right, clinton has serious holes in her healthcare plan. "

mycuzinloraine wrote on Oct 17, 2007 2:40 PM:

" Let's see, President Reagan had to come in and clean up behind Jimmy Carter. Then President Bush had to come in and clean up behind the Clintons. It's alwasy a mess when Democrats are in office. Why do you ask why the Clintons want to come back and make a mess? I guess it has to do with the pact the two made with each other. "Help me to get elected president and I will help you". Now I ask ya, Is that true love or what.? " "

mycuzinloraine wrote on Oct 16, 2007 11:51 AM:

" Oh by the way, mikeutsey, I feel great about myself. Haven't felt better and to robertin charlotte, because I refuse to vote for Hillary Clinton because she hates this country and my president does not make me hateful just smarter than you. "

mycuzinloraine wrote on Oct 16, 2007 11:47 AM:

" Sorry guys. I do keep up with politics. But I find it very hard to understand the liberals in this country. They constantly make attacks on the conservatives and MY president but when someone calls Clinton out you guys comes out swinging. Hillary is a liar and flip flops on every issue she's ever addressed. Ignore it if yall want to, but we all know we will NEVER get a straight answer out of he mouth. And speaking of hate spewing, one needs to only look her way. How anybody takes her serious is beyond me. "

confisussum wrote on Oct 15, 2007 8:35 AM:

" My hope is that not everyone is as gullible to media reporting as robert in charlotte. The fact of the matter is, that in 1993 when this socialist ideology was first introduced, it was met with resistance from ALL political circles. Democrats, and Republicans alike saw this for what it was then, and what it is now. Government run healthcare. When we will discard the notion that it is the responsibility of the government to provide for it's citizens. There is no Utopia, regardless of whether Hillary says she can create one, "with your tax dollars". As another poster has stated, it is the typical democrat strategy to buy votes using hot button topics, and then NEVER keep their promises. My question is, how is someone who is in favor of LESS government an extremist? The better question is, aren't all democrats socialists? "

swillabill wrote on Oct 14, 2007 8:25 AM:

" While liberals gush over anything that spews out of Billary's mouth, they do little in the way of checking out available data. The facts are obvious to those willing to look for them. A quick visit north of the border shows the effect of a nationalized health care system. You must question the effectiveness of this system, when Canada's Prime Minister comes to the US for healthcare, as most in Canada would love to do. It is shameful that most do not recognize this political rhetoric for what it is. "A chicken in every pot" campaign promise is as old as the concept of democracy. What Billary has failed to do is provide an idea of where the money is going to come from. As with all liberal ideas, the are frought with high administration costs and little substance. Sure liberals want to grow the government, easier to get their constituency jobs. As far as increasing Pell grants, instead of increasing them, why not stop overpaying the institutions and releasing that money to the students in the form of a refund. Millions of dollars are paid out every year in the form of "refunds" to students who never paid anything out of their own pockets. Then this money is used for non educational items, such as electronics, auto accessories, etc... Bottom line, if the American people want inferior doctors, who have no incentive to create drugs, advanced treatment procedures, or any other disease research then vote for Billary. If they want month long waits for basic health care, vote for Billary. If they want to have to travel extreme distances for doctor visits, then by all means, vote for Billary. "

robertincharlotte wrote on Oct 12, 2007 9:57 PM:

" mycuzinloraine, what happened to her proposed health care plan during the Clinton presidency is that right wing extremists killed it. It is very simmilar to several state plans already implemented. She did not fail to deliver, but was cut off at the knees by those who were afraid of change. Her ideas were ahead of theit time and maybe now we can fully appreciate the brilliance and empathy she truely has for all Americans regaurding this issue. And as far as your last comment about hating this country, well, it doesnt make any sense. Once again those who oppose her try to demonize her rather than respectfully decline to support her. What is so terrifying about her? Is it the idea of a well informed, well educated, experienced strong woman being in the white house? Not to mention how nice it would be to have a president who can form a complete sentence and utter it without making a complete idiot oh themselves. Dont be so hateful. hate only breeds hate. "

mikeutsey wrote on Oct 12, 2007 8:36 PM:

" mycuzinloraine If you have been following politics and government you would realize that the health plan was vetoed by George W Bush a couple weeks ago. The person that stopped the health plan was a republican president. I understand how people just throw around this right wing conservative and left wing liberal as if any of you that use the terminology actually know what it means. Once again we find ourselves using terminology we don't know the meaning of, because you hear others use it. Rely on your own mind, you would feel alot better of yourself when making such strong statements. Have A Nice Day! "

mycuzinloraine wrote on Oct 12, 2007 1:00 PM:

" Senator Matthews, I think we both know that Hillary Clinton is a blow hard full of empty promises. What happened to this great healthcare reform she proposed during the Clinton-Gore Administration? I won't vote for her or any other far left wing liberal that hates this country as she does. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News