* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• THE TICKET: Showtimes, reviews, games & more
• DINING GUIDE:Your source for T&D Region restaurants
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• PET CORNER: Your home for news and PET IDOL
Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Student reaction mixed on ouster of SCSU president

By DIONNE GLEATON, T&D Staff WriterThursday, December 13, 2007

5 comment(s) | Default | Large

Sadness, indifference and relief were among the reactions among South Carolina State University students following the ouster of the university's ninth president.

University trustees voted not to renew Dr. Andrew Hugine Jr.'s contract, which expires in June 2008, during a Tuesday teleconference. He was immediately placed on administrative leave, with his last day scheduled to be Jan. 4.

Most students were surprised by the decision.

"I was definitely surprised, but I don't understand the full situation of what happened to say I agree with what the school did, or I don't," said Dean Moore, a junior political science major.

Moore, a 20-year-old member of the university track team, said Hugine did much to enhance the track and field department and the campus in general.

"I didn't see anything negative about what he was doing on campus. At the same time, I really don't know what he could have done to the people up top," he said. "He was part of the school and our tradition, so I'm definitely sad to see him go."

Hugine received his bachelor's and master's degrees from S.C. State. He served as Student Government Association president during his junior and senior years at the institution.

He later accepted a student-support position at S.C. State. Along the way, he maintained his professorship in mathematics, teaching even while in the position of interim executive vice president.

Dorothy Wheat, a sophomore early child education major, said she also was surprised and saddened by the decision.

"I guess it could be for the better, but I personally think he shouldn't be dismissed yet. He's done a lot of things to try to keep up the campus. Personally, I don't think nobody could come close to him," the 19-year-old said. "It kinda shocked me when I heard about it."

"When I first got here, I didn't see any problems from the way he had the campus set up and everything," said 18-year-old Ron Lyles, a freshman biology major. "He was probably one of the reasons I came here."

Fellow 18-year-old freshmen Brandi Jones and Courtney Stukes said they are convinced the school will be fine once the dust has settled.

"It's obviously a good institution, otherwise I wouldn't have come. I know every university has its problems, but I think it's gonna be fine. We'll be OK," Jones said.

Jamal Brock, 18, said he's somewhat indifferent as a first-semester freshman.

"It doesn't even bother me really. I can't really tell if anything's changed, but it was kind of surprising to me because I wasn't even here when it happened. I don't really know what happened," Brock said.

Sophomore business major Tyrone Gilyard said Hugine was a "cool" president.

"I saw him around campus a couple of times talking to students. I've been in convocation ceremonies where he's given speeches. I'm pretty sure that there's already confusion, but I hope we can move forward to better things. They're already saying it's 'a new state of mind,' so hopefully we will," the 20-year-old Gilyard said.

Trease Hanna, a 22-year-old senior majoring in fashion merchandising, is happy about graduating in May, but not about Hugine's departure. She said the board, however, evidently had its reasons for ousting the president.

"I guess they based it off the education process and what he has done for us as far as education-wise. I say the improvement needs to be in the education process. But, other than that, I think he has done a lot of nice things campuswide as far as its appearance," said Hanna, who started school in 2003, the same year Hugine began serving as president.

Shade Watkins said the whole issue stands to reflect a negative light upon the university and that Hugine's dismissal should not be publicly discussed.

"It's nobody's business. I agree with the university to keep it low and as quiet as possible," said the 20-year-old sophomore child education major.

S.C. State graduate Annie Williams, who now serves as an office assistant at the university, said the president's dismissal was done at the wrong time.

"I know about the controversy with housing and the report. But, to me, it was bad timing if the university is going through the transformation from where it was to the progress it has now. Not to be biased or anything, but he (Hugine) was my professor when I was a student here. .... He had very good leadership skills," Williams said.

She noted that some and alumni and staff were not pleased with many of his early changes.

"Some were like, 'Why are you doing this?' or "Why are you doing that?' When they saw the progress that was coming from it, they were like, 'OK, he's doing his job and what he says.' He had the Democratic debate to come here with the help of (Sixth District Congressman and Majority Whip) Jim Clyburn and got the new living facility for students with help from the U.S. Department of Education.

"That's what I can say about it, but if the board felt like they wanted to dismiss him, then that's what they decided on," Williams said.

Mark Stoney, however, said he was not fortunate enough to receive housing -- or a meal plan -- this semester. The senior criminal justice major from New Jersey said he was consequently relieved at Hugine's ousting.

Six traditional residence halls and three apartment-style complexes -- including the newly built Andrew Hugine Suites, a $42 million, 755-bed facility completed in 2006 -- were available for students to reside in this semester. An increased demand for on-campus housing by upperclassmen and a nearly 35 percent higher freshman enrollment rate this fall semester, however, caused a housing shortage in August.

"People were like, 'You're gonna be all right.' You try sleeping on somebody's couch and not having a meal plan. You gotta be real humble," said Stoney, who was not shocked by the board's decision.

"As long as they bring in somebody better for the job, I don't really have too much to say. Honestly, it's finals week and I couldn't care less," Stoney said. "I'm trying to take my last final and go home. I'm just blessed I that I made it this far."

T&D Staff Writer Dionne Gleaton can be reached by e-mail at dgleaton@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-533-5534. Discuss this and other stories online at TheTandD.com.

 
5 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

Tigger_616 wrote on Dec 13, 2007 3:17 PM:

" As I have seen so many times SC State board has made a tremindous mistake the only person that is going to be able to fill this man position is already employed as Claflin University's president. He was my math instructor and the man is GOD sent in many compacities. When we as African Americans get jealous of one another or we just decide that we are no longer going to kiss butt, this is what happens. Nothing good ever comes out of situations like these. Ask Orangeburg Four, they got a habbit of firing for no apparent reason and everyone one they fired without a probabel cause their position has gone lacking in the worst way. GOD don't Bless mess. Get it together black people and stop giving other schools,the media, and other people something to talk about. swallow your pride and give the man his job back; now you want to do something, get rid of Maurice!!!!! "

Carolina KId wrote on Dec 13, 2007 12:34 PM:

" I am a SCSU alumnus class of 2002. When I was a student there SC State was in desperate need of repair. I think Hugine has done a fantastic job in catching SCSU up with other institutions.If academics was the problem, I don't think he should have been dismissed like that without being given a chance to fix it. I feel for the student that did not have a room or a meal plan, but the reason enrollment went up is because Dr. Hugine made that campus beautiful and attracted students there. Let's see who they get next because the two before him did nothing! "

ftalleyjr wrote on Dec 13, 2007 12:29 PM:

" Next, how do we go about Demanding Resignations and receiving same from Chairman Washington and his cronies? That's the First major question to Right this Wrong. "

google wrote on Dec 13, 2007 12:27 PM:

" There seems to be some confusion. Hugine is not South Carolina State University. This is the problem, he promoted himself as the University. It is the many dedicated faculty, staff and students that makes the university. Not one man, and not buildings. I agree with the writer who said you need to get the facts before you start speaking out. It is these idiotic comments from the alumni without knowing the facts that has a bad reflection on the University. The things you give him credit for would have happened regardless of who was in that position. "

Bmore#1 wrote on Dec 13, 2007 8:26 AM:

" Will the students, alumni and friends of the University ever get an answer as to why Dr. Hugine was fired. To date, there hasn't been any disclosure of the report(s)mentioned as the basis for this firing. And unless and until they are fully disclose for all to see, I still contend those who had in hand in the ousting of the Prez under the cover of darkness are cowards! "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.
(LARRY HARDY/T&D)

Related Links


VOTED OUT - Videos, polls, comments and more

More News