* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

S.C. attorney general: No need to sue feds yet over new licenses

By JIM DAVENPORT, The Associated Press  Monday, March 24, 2008

Leave a Comment | Default | Large

COLUMBIA, S.C. - It is too early for South Carolina to sue the federal government over new driver’s licenses that meet federal security requirements, state Attorney General Henry McMaster said Monday.

South Carolina should show the Department of Homeland Security what it already has done to make driver’s licenses more secure following the September 11 terror attacks, McMaster said in an opinion released Monday. That, McMaster argued, will show the federal agency that the state is meeting the standards of the new law, known as Real ID.

A lawsuit arguing that federal government has overstepped its authority “would be at this point, premature,” McMaster wrote.

South Carolina and five other states have passed laws barring compliance with the federal law out of privacy and cost concerns.

Gov. Mark Sanford has been considering whether to seek an extension to comply with the law. If Sanford doesn’t seek one by March 31, South Carolinians won’t be able to use state driver’s licenses for identification alone to board airplanes or enter federal buildings and may have to undergo extra security checks.

McMaster said there’s a gray area between the state and federal laws that has helped other states with bans, citing a Homeland Security decision Friday not to sanction Montana after that state told the federal agency all the steps it had taken to make its licenses more secure. The federal agency interpreted that as an extension request and said the state’s residents wouldn’t be sanctioned.

On Friday, Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer told The Associated Press there had been no extension request.

The governor’s office was reviewing McMaster’s opinion and letters other states had sent Homeland Security, Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer said Monday.

“We’re still evaluating all of our options, and haven’t made any determinations yet,” Sawyer said.

Legal action, while still possible, is made difficult by the most recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on a similar challenge, McMaster said. In that 2000 case, South Carolina argued against complying with a federal law barring public access to personal driver’s license information.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
Leave a Comment
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News