* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Adult club gets alcohol license over objections

By GENE ZALESKI, T&D Staff Writer  Thursday, June 19, 2008

30 comment(s) | Default | Large

The people who fought the opening of the Zodiac Private Club on North Road admit they’ve been beat for now. But they say they will keep hoping and praying it will shut down.

Opponents of the club fought its application for a license to serve alcohol, with the issue landing before an Administrative Law Court judge. On April 30, the judge ruled the club can serve alcohol as long as it abides by certain restrictions. And then, last month, it received its license to serve alcohol.

“I was disappointed the license was granted because I believe our protest with them locating a strip club in a residential area and an on-premise license in a community is detrimental,” Orangeburg Baptist Tabernacle Pastor Thomas Brookshire said.

“We’re going to continue praying the business will close. We believe it’s a detriment to the community it’s located in and we believe it’s a detriment to Orangeburg County as a Community of Character,” he said.

Residents of the area collected the signatures of at least 380 people opposed to a license for the club, which is located on the corner at North Road and Twelve Oaks Drive in an old warehouse.

In the ALC’s order, Zodiac is described as, “a members-only, by-invitation-only club and offers adult entertainment.” The nearest residence is 231 feet away.

Zodiac’s application for the license was made by Hunter-Kinard-Tyler High School football coach Jermaine Derricott, who is identified in the ALC order as “the principle member of the business seeking requested permit and license.” Derricott referred calls to Eugene James, who identified himself and Derricott as the two officers of the club.

James said Club Zodiac has abided by all regulations. He said he is the club’s manager.

Derricott’s involvement is “very limited,” James said, noting that Derricott was listed as the lone “principle” only to expedite license approval.

James said he has a lot of money invested in the business and “can’t just walk away.” But he expressed his sympathy with the concerns of the neighbors.

“I understand the concerns of the people in the neighborhood,” he said. “I have kids and a family as well.”

James said there have been no significant problems at the club since the Administrative Law Court’s decision. He says the club houses private gatherings like bachelorette and bachelor parties, as well as parties for alumni from area colleges and universities.

“When I was looking for a place, I was not aware of the fact that it would be a problem there,” James said. “We have steps in place to make the club safe for the people in the community.”

“They don’t want the club there because of the nature of the business,” James said, stressing that the business is more than a so-called “gentleman’s club.”

While the ALC judge granted the license to serve alcohol, the club is required to:

* Maintain adequate security lighting in the parking lot.

* Maintain visible security personnel both inside and outside the club during hours of operation.

* Take reasonable measures to prevent loitering outside the club and illegal activity inside the club and parking lot area.

* Take reasonable measures to ensure music or noise from the club and its immediate surroundings is not discernibly audible from the nearest residence to the proposed location when the doors and windows of the residence are closed.

* Ensure there is adequate parking and the club patrons do not park without permission on private property not owned or leased by the Zodiac.

The judge’s order concludes by noting the, “violation of any of the ... conditions shall be deemed a violation of the permit and license.” The Orangeburg County Sheriff’s Office on Monday reported there has been only one noise complaint filed against Zodiac in the past 60 days.

Brookshire said he’s thankful restrictions were placed on the club.

“They had taken into consideration our concerns,” he said. “I am pleased with the restrictions they placed on them.”

Brenna Kinard, who lives about a quarter a mile rom the club, used two words to describe her feelings.

“Hate it,” said Kinard, who has lived in the neighborhood for 25 years. “At first he was good about his music not being too loud. But now his music is loud. It starts around 11 p.m. and goes to 5 a.m.”

Kinard explained she has a 2-year-old grandson who visits her house often and says she does not want him exposed to the club.

“I would rather not have it in my neighborhood and all that goes along with places like that,” she said.

James said the club does not have any adult pictures outside identifying it as a adult club.

Orangeburg County Administrator Bill Clark, who attended the Administrative Law Court hearing on behalf of concerned residents along with Orangeburg County Councilwoman Janie Cooper, said he would “not second-guess the judge.”

“We will have to accept the decision and rely on the owners to live up to their commitment to operate in a proper manner and within the law,” Clark said. “They are entitled to due process of the law and the judge heard their case and heard the testimony of the county and she rendered a decision.”

Orangeburg County Deputy Administrator Harold Young said the club is operating legally within the county’s building codes, operation requirements and zoning regulations. The club was opened before Orangeburg County put its zoning regulations in place, allowing its operations to be grandfathered in.

But under a nonconforming use section of the county’s zoning ordinance, should the club be damaged or destroyed, work on its replacement must begin within 12 months of the time of damage or the vested right to rebuild would be forfeited.

“From a legal standpoint, we will monitor the situation from a compliance standpoint,” Young said.

Brookshire is resigned to the fact that the club will remain open.

“There’s not any more recourse we have. The only thing we can do is if they violate the terms of license,” he said. “That would be up to Sheriff’s Office to enforce something like that.”

T&D Staff Writer Gene Zaleski can be reached by e-mail at gzaleski@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-533-5551.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
30 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

minimouse wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:12 AM:

" PG
That last post was wild.
I once saw something similar to it in a burning paper bag that I found when answering the door bell late one evening.

You should let this "old friend" know where I have slandered in any post. As for the allegation that I am ugly towards children you must remind me of when this occured.
Perhaps you have been hurt by someone and have now convinced yourself that minimouse is she.
You have never met me nor would I know you if you walked in my room right now. Only in this blog have you and I ever communicated.
Sorry to disappoint you. "

pedingsgang wrote on Jun 27, 2008 10:21 PM:

" MM, I waited for this to go off the front page so that so many people won't see it... But here goes, Loser C**** (Yes, that was a poor choice for the first letter but you fell for it hook, line, and sinker. Surely you know I wouldn't try to ruin you by giving your last initial also?) I would have called but since your number is not listed and it would be unethical to use it from the list I have, this seems to be the only way to communicate. You have been warned on this site by something called "7734" to be careful, but as someone who was once a friend, slander is a real chance you are taking. Anonimity is great as long as a complaint is not filed with valid evidence (that would be these blogs) and then the police go down to the T&D and they have to give them your e-mail address. Then I am told that locating the computer from that point is just a matter of time. Your parents might not care but the board could get pretty upset and your job could be toast. You've got some beautiful grandkids that you need to think of instead of yourself. Your animosity towards life, euphemisms, even use of Spanish give you away; not just to me but to others in the community. I'm writing this because in a strange way I feel responsible for letting you spout on when I knew who you were and now you may find yourself in serious water. However, I will say this, your ugliness to children may not come back to haunt you in this life, but it will in the next. Peace. mp "

minimouse wrote on Jun 27, 2008 8:47 AM:

" pg
Ours is a strange and wonderful relationship!
You are strange and I am wonderful! "

pedingsgang wrote on Jun 26, 2008 9:54 PM:

" "A 'coward' by any other name would 'stink as bad.'" "

minimouse wrote on Jun 26, 2008 1:31 PM:

" PG
You said "Blogging is just a way to say what you want about others without having to suffer the consequences from the ones you are attacking or others in the community for your opinion."
You finally get it!

If you want to have your name attached to every opinion Write a letter to the editor.
Blogging is just right for saying what is on your mind with out worrying that some nut job doesnt hunt you down and whack you. There are lots of nut jobs in this world.
You and I seem to aggree on the issue of educators being involved in the strip joint business. I am glad that people in the dark world of the night club business dont know my name.

Is LC your guess at my initials?

I thought last week it was NC(Nameless Coward.)

Congrats to your daughter. I saw the story last week on her. "

sweetypie wrote on Jun 26, 2008 12:56 PM:

" To yadanac,
Loved your post to tubalo, I started to do the same thing but I just gave up it was just too many errors to even count. I am with you proud to be a country bumpkin and a redneck, one thing is for sure at least we know how to write and spell. Kudos to you yadanac. "

pedingsgang wrote on Jun 26, 2008 7:30 AM:

" What does it matter what anyone on these blogs say... no one has to own up to it. yadanac, yours is pretty obvious; and mm (aka LC), you really need to get a new handle 'cause if I can figure it out, anyone can. Blogging is just a way to say what you want about others without having to suffer the consequences from the ones you are attacking or others in the community for your opinion. Unless you belong to a witness protection program, you should have to sign your name to these things. Melody Pedings "

7734 wrote on Jun 25, 2008 10:10 PM:

" MINIMOUSE:
The best thing you can do is keep your mouth shut. before you stick your foot so far down it that you choke to death!!!!! "

yadanac wrote on Jun 24, 2008 5:27 PM:

" This post is in direct response to the post made by tubalo on June 23, 2008.

Tubalo, you are very quick to label your fellow citizens "country bumpkins." I think that you proved that you are "right smack dab" in the middle of that category. (Did I correctly use the "country bumpkin terminology?) Truth be told, I got sick of counting when reviewing your post in an attempt to calculate how many spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors you made in the few sentences you managed to put together.... (Let's hear it for the country bumpkin, tubalo! Woo Hoo!)

You are fully entitled to your opinion, BUT SO IS EVERYONE ELSE.

I believe that you should keep that in mind before you start calling people names, simply because they don't share your opinion on the subject at hand.

Truth be told, the idea of being called a "country bumpkin" does not insult me. It is sad that someone could find a way to use that as an insult? I'm truly sorry that is disappointing to you, considering I am fairly certain that it WAS intended to be an insult.

For me, being "country" is a way of life. It means having respect for yourself and others, having moral values, and defending yourself or a friend if need be. It is something to be proud of!

Hell, you could call me a redneck and I might even be appreciative.

Ya'all come back now, ya hear?! "

minimouse wrote on Jun 24, 2008 5:05 PM:

" ok fshmct
You let your daughter go to this school and cheerlead these horny boys who have for their role model and guide this guy who not only approves of strip club mentality towards women but is actually invested in the promotion of degrading women as se# objects. My daughter will go to a district that demands at the very least that no appearance of impropriety will be tolerated by anyone employed as educators.

As for the coach Price story he was fired for things done as a direct result of him going to that bar.
I assure you that if he had been an owner of the same bar he would not have been hired to coach. The chances of something inappropriate happening when you are involved in this type business goes up astronomically. Why risk hiring someone with a seedy background if you are supposed to be in the business of improving childrens lives? "

fhsmct wrote on Jun 24, 2008 2:17 PM:

" Adding to the FACTS about the coach at Bama: he also took one of the "dancers" back to his room for the night, then, the next morn, left in his school paid for room, let her run up a large room service bill (she literally ordered one of EVERYthing on the menu, to go).

I seriously doubt that Jermaine has done anything remotely close to that.


Mini: FULLY research before you cite (they used to teach that in 9th grade English) . . . "

minimouse wrote on Jun 23, 2008 7:09 PM:

" I have no objections to a man owning and operating a strip club with alcohol sales.
Well aside from it being a business that lowers the morality of an ever increasing number of people.( esp. young women who get into this for the thrill and money, only to have their lives spiral into drugged out crack whores most of the time.)
The problem is the man also being employed at a school where a higher standard of behavior is vital. When this guy tries to mix the two wildly different life ambitions. Mentor of youth and Lord of the lounge lizards should not be found on the same resume' "

SweetHomeCarolina wrote on Jun 23, 2008 7:07 PM:

" Just for arguments sake...let's say instead of the football coach involved, it is the cheerleading coach who is "employed" by this adult entertainment establishment. Her involvement is limited, only working 1 or 2 nights a week. How would you feel as a parent? Would you still make the separation between "personal" and "professional" life? Unfortunately, when you choose to become a part of the educational system, those two paths do cross. Finally, how is the coaches involvement limited? The liquor license is a pretty big part of a club. "

beast wrote on Jun 23, 2008 2:44 PM:

" I do not believe this was a good decision on the behalf of the coach. I agree, what a man does outside of work should be his own business. However, all that changes when you work with children. For example, several states, including S.C., have morality and professionalism clauses that if judged/seen as broken by the state department of education could cause the educator his/her liscense. These clauses are vague, however I think they would/could apply to such a situation as this one.
I wish Mr. Derricott the best, but I think he made a poor decision by becoming involved with this club - whatever that involvement may be. Because, unfortunately, given the way the rules for liscensure to teach in this state are written and shared, it could cost him not just his job, but his career as an educator.
Wake up people, this is SO much bigger than someone having a business on the side. Whether you agree with it or not, he chose to neglect the terms of his teaching liscense and to gamble with his career as an educator. It very well could bite him.

http://www.scteachers.org/cert/certpdf/standardsofconduct.pdf "

tiger man wrote on Jun 23, 2008 1:45 PM:

" In response to those comments calling for Mr. Derricott to be fired, there are a few things that should be pointed out. As for the citing of The University of Alabama's firing of Mike Price, there were many more reasons for his dismissal than simply visiting a topless bar. The fact is Mr. Price was photographed in a topless bar with players from his team as well as potential recruits. There were also accusations of illegal recruiting practices under Price's supervision. The sum of all the parts was the reason Price was fired. It had nothing to do with him being at a topless club. There is no law against an adult going to a place such as this. It should be noted that no where in this article did it state that Mr. Derricott has even set foot inside this place since it has been open. There is no evidence at all of any wrong doing on Mr. Derricott's part, and still there are those who are calling for his firing. It seems that any time there is a story that has a connection to Hunter Kinard Tyler High School, there is never a shortage of folks who take the opportunity to take shots at those involved. It's makes you wonder, are these people genuinely concearned about this, or is this just another personal vendetta against Mr. Derricott? "

minimouse wrote on Jun 23, 2008 10:15 AM:

" Asking a question in a blog is does not rise to the standard for slandar. Stating an opinion about some one is protected free speech. Precident for removing a coach for impropriety involving a strip club is easy to find. Example:
Sunday, May 4, 2003
Price fired as Alabama football coach


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


By GORDON PAULUS
Pensacola (Fla.) News Journal

The University of Alabama fired football coach Mike Price on Saturday for actions that included a trip to a topless bar in Pensacola.

University president Robert Witt said that Price failed to live his "personal and professional life in a manner consistent with university policies." "

sickofcrying wrote on Jun 23, 2008 9:33 AM:

" It really amazes me how people can sit around and be so judgemental about what someone else does or how they make their money legitimately. So what they own a club if you don't like it don't go. everyone on here has probably went to a club or two in their life. if you haven'e you seem to know mighty mush about what supposely goes on in them. Someone is quick to say fire him from the school. If he is fired then how is he suppose to make money then. Don't justify everything with "he works with kids" so what, as long as he is not doing anytyhing to harm them. You have parents that are not fit to be parents, you have preachers molesting boys, you have kids having kids, gas prices are sky high the economy is in a mess and you are worried about a club that has not broken any laws. People are always quick to jump on a bashing bandwagon personelly i don't think the coaches name should have been singled out the way it was but of course that is how the "paper and news media" operates. The Sheriff was just re-elected and didn't he campaign on crime stats being at an all time low since he took office. So why are worried about crime being so bad in the area. "

dennis wrote on Jun 23, 2008 8:56 AM:

" i see why the hunter kinard tyler high school football team was so disruptive during the past year. is this the man who you have over your children? my GOD!! where are the real men in the community?? the coach's actions are a reflection on hunter kinard tyler high school, it's school board, the admin, teachers and students. is this why the school has a low rating. what is he teaching? how to pull a hooker part one. when your teachers support this kind of trash, it's sad for the community. my child will never attend h-k-t. and i will advise the other parents to start looking for another school to enroll their children. if not ... find another school zone. or elect a new board!@# "

tubalo wrote on Jun 23, 2008 7:34 AM:

" VERDICT IN! Orangeburg has got to have some of the most ignorant country bumpkins in the world. Being a native of Orangeburg its embarrasing to read just how stupid (not politically correct, but only word most of you will understand) alot of people are. He we have a TOTALLY legit business in all places out of city limits, and although backing to a neighborhood its not in there. No problems, proper security, licensing etc. and you still have something to say. This coming from a community where the thug life and selling dope is more glamorized than obtaining a college degree, hell alot of folk don't even have a GED. Yet these two men are trying to provide ( in a legal way) for their families and like crabs in a barrel you try your best to bring them down. To all those who oppose not only this establishment, but anything legit should chek their self. Through reading the comments someone stated they didn't want there kids around that in their neighorhood, but I ask what the hell are your kids doing out that late anyway? If you spent more time raising your kids and teaching them right from wrong you won't have to worry about where they are 2-3am and if they are at the club, or worst doing what they are usually doing.....getting high with friends. Is it that you are all just horrible parents tryin to at least illiminate what could be additional police patrols in your area so you and your kids could continue your illegal antics? Or are you really concerned about a club with no where to hide on a major road for everyone to see? Or are you just that dumb and salty that because your pockets are hurting and in a recession that you would like to see everyone as miserable? Crabs in a barrel! Its sad to see that even after hundreds of yrs of being freed some are still caught in that don't run to far or Ima tell Massah mentality! Wake up people, use your energy to get your family prorities straight, and keep them babies out the street! "

fhsmct wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:53 AM:

" I'm no fan of the growing number of "adult" establishments in our community.

That being clearly stated:

CountryGoneCity:
Ethics clause?

What has he done wrong? Legally owning and operating a business establishment & applying for business and liquor licenses is not exactly a criminal offense.

Some may oppose “adult” establishments (& that's is one's right in this country) but he’d probably make a mint suing the school system for firing him for the "offense" of legal ownership of a legit business.

MiniMouse: don't make insinuating allegations you can't back up; It's called "slander" and their are legal ramifications therefore.

Over my many years, I've known "respectable" members of the community who, behind doors, owned and operated enterprises that were 180 in opposition to the public's perception of them.

In a county with a horrid economic base, at least it's a legit tax revenue producing business. . . "

pedingsgang wrote on Jun 21, 2008 9:45 AM:

" As parents and community members, are we really ready to say that what a teacher does in his/her private life doesn't matter? A teacher has the job of molding minds of young people for a paycheck 8-10 hours a day. And if you're a parent, you know that what you do when you don't think the children are looking is more important than your "big talk". You're right, mikeutsey, "times have changed" but I'm not convinced they are for the better. "

grits66 wrote on Jun 20, 2008 12:07 PM:

" When someone practices a "risque" personal life, it is bound to spill over into their business life. There should be concern especially when it involves minors.

The is an absolute shame!!! So much for Orangeburg County Zoning.. it apppears that was a big waste of time. We as citizen of Orangeburg County must rise against the crime, and injustice of this situation. Law abiding, tay paying, reputable families raising their children should not have to have this type of business so close to their homes. There should be a place for this type of business, not bring potential perverts and acoholic into our neighboors to prey on our youth. We should be outraged. I pray that it will not take a death or brutal crime for those powers to be to see this is not appropriate. "

Tigger_ wrote on Jun 19, 2008 11:42 PM:

" Selling alcohol is a total conflict of interest especially when he is as influential to young teenage males like he does. Also, him being in the publuc school system is a conflict of interest come on now he might as well be a striper or be a pimp himself he is already running a legalized whore house. And GeraBell as for his private life? he has no when working with young children everything becomes public knowledge. Just like it is wrong for politicians, the president, and pastors as well as other public figures it is wrong for the football coach because he has a closer hands on effect on the children he serve. It might as well had been the principal! It is flat out wrong! Its either the kids or the whores! Pick your choice. you cant have your cake and eat it to. Even the BIBLE tells us we can't SERVE two GODS for we will LOVE one and HATE the other. "

mikeutsey wrote on Jun 19, 2008 9:07 PM:

" You people are laughable.....This businesses is operating under the ordinances set forth in Orangeburg County....They are abiding by the rules and restrictions placed on them. They are doing nothing wrong to you or your family members, and yet you still have a problem with a law abiding business. Then on top of that, since you could not when the legal battles, you try to attack the character of a legitimate business owner...just SAD! Keep in mind this establishment provides security for its patrons, believe it or not, it also in a sense provide security for land and home owners in the area, due to the increase patrol in the area. And it will be increased patrol in the area because of you disgruntled people who don't want it to operate will be calling the sheriff's office with bogus complaints. Normal people know how people such as yourself operate.

Times have changed, deal with it or keep it moving! Say what your really mean and stop masking it for public consumption.

Enuff Said! "

nickyd wrote on Jun 19, 2008 7:01 PM:

" People please.......the coach's personal life has nothing to do with his ability to coach a football team. If anything he's teaching those children to be entrepreneurs and business owners. I am sure he's not exposing them to anything inappropriate.
Maybe they could have chosen a less controversial location but the comments saying the he should be fired are absurd.

P.S. This is for 'Damfiknow' don't embarrass yourself further by posting another comment. You seem to be illiterate. "

Gerabell wrote on Jun 19, 2008 5:26 PM:

" Profiling? So what does his private life have to do with job? "

beast wrote on Jun 19, 2008 4:44 PM:

" Wow. What a great example this coach is setting for the students/athletes he coaches. Something like this is never good for your image. What was he thinking??

This is yet another slap in the face to the teachers who do everything they can to set a positive example for the students in their schools. "

minimouse wrote on Jun 19, 2008 4:41 PM:

" I hope the school board fires this coach. What a role model. He has got to go. Does he recruit entertainers from the school? "

countrygonecity wrote on Jun 19, 2008 2:41 PM:

" Very disturbing...I live in Seattle, WA - one of the most liberal cities in the US and the city officials here do not allow facilites that sell alcohol to be anywhere near a strip club, much less allow the clubs to sell the stuff. Strip clubs are also not allowed to be anywhere near areas where children might be present, such as school or residential areas. Sounds like the officials in Seattle may have more education.... OH - and does this type of venture somehow conflict with the coach's job at an institution of public education? Doesn't the state of South Carolina or the county have some type of ethic policy for those that they employee? "

damfiknow wrote on Jun 19, 2008 8:44 AM:

" here come more sad singing and flowers bringing.pastor i agree with you 110% there would be more durg use and etc .keep parying "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.
The Zodiac Club’s two principals are identified by the Administrative Law Court as H-K-T High School football coach Jermaine Derricott and Eugene James. The two received a state license to sell alcohol at the club -- permission gained over the formal objections of Orangeburg County and 380 people who signed a petition. (LARRY HARDY/T&D)




More News