* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Audit is source of finance probe at S.C. State

By LEE TANT, T&D Staff Writer  Sunday, June 29, 2008

24 comment(s) | Default | Large

An investigation by the 1st Circuit Solicitor’s Office at South Carolina State centers around an internal audit questioning use of funds in the university’s finance department, Solicitor David Pascoe confirms.

A copy of the May 2007 audit obtained by The Times and Democrat questions the awarding of contracts to the daughter of Senior Vice President of Finance John Smalls and the use of funds by Smalls’ former assistant, who is not identified by name in the document.

“Because there is a pending investigation, the university will have no comment,” S.C. State spokeswoman Erica Prioleau said. When contacted, Smalls said he also would not comment until the investigation is complete.

Among findings, the audit states that the assistant used a state credit card to purchase $3,500 in clothes from a high-end retailer; several decorating contracts were given to Smalls’ daughter in violation of university policy; canteen funds were used to establish a $10,000 open purchase order at S.C. State’s faculty dining hall; and thousands of dollars were charged to state credit cards to purchase a variety of items for personal use.

The State Ethics Commission investigated in the wake of the audit, with Executive Director Herb Hayden then approaching 1st Circuit Solicitor David Pascoe with the findings.

“After initial review of their findings, I decided to take a closer look at it and make a decision,” Pascoe said last month.

Pascoe confirmed that the internal audit, completed last May by the university, brought about an investigation by his office.

The audit was conducted by former S.C. State Internal Audit Director Christine Glover, who now works for the state. Calls to her office and home were not immediately returned.

However, S.C. State Board Chairman Maurice Washington contends that not everything in the audit is accurate and that any inappropriate actions have been addressed. He declined to be more specific because he said the audit was presented to trustees in an executive session.

Interim President Dr. Leonard McIntyre also said a number of the issues in the audit were addressed, but he did not elaborate.

Washington deferred to former S.C. State President Dr. Andrew Hugine to comment on what actions were taken after the audit was presented.

Hugine said he could not comment at this time on any matter that occurred during his presidency. The audit indicated Hugine requested the review of the finance department.

Washington said the audit had no part in the board’s decision to oust Hugine last December. “Absolutely not,” he said.

n Use of credit cards

The audit states that during 2006, Smalls’ assistant made $5,503.81 in charges to a state credit card. The card is to “be used only for the purchase of supplies.”

The assistant used the card on two occasions to buy clothing at a Columbia-based Granger Owings, the audit states. Of those purchases, only once was a receipt given to the university. That receipt showed two suits and six monogrammed shirts totaling more than $2,000 were purchased.

Also charged to the card was the purchase of a $380.75 pen from Mont Blanc in Charlotte as a Christmas gift to Smalls, according to the audit. That purchase was then charged to the university’s canteen funds, but the audit states that several employees contributed to the purchase of the pen with their personal money.

Canteen funds are revenue taken in from athletic contests, the university’s bookstore and other student activities. The funds are not regulated by the state procurement code.

Smalls also had a credit card assigned to him. During a review period between January 2006 and February 2007, more than $31,000 was charged to that account, of which only $10,974.17 was for office supplies, the audit states.

Two purchases totaling $5,000 were made using that card at Wal-Mart. They were for gift cards ahead of the 2006 holiday season, according to the audit.

On Dec. 7, 2006, Smalls authorized the purchase of $2,877.50 in American Express gift checks, using canteen funds, the audit states.

In addition, nearly $5,000 was charged to the card for travel, which the audit states is expressly prohibited by policy.

Also, 12 different charges were made for snacks in Orangeburg, Barnwell, Denmark and Bamberg, totaling $879.92. Plus, $118.19 was spent on cologne at Belk department store, according to the audit.

Washington said purchases of a refrigerator and television with the card were appropriate, as both were for university use.

n Conflict of interest

The audit identified five circumstances from 2003 to 2006 in which $34,693 in decorating contracts were given to Georgia-based Perfect Creations and Design, owned by Smalls’ daughter. The contracts were authorized by either Smalls or a member of his staff.

The audit states that on four of the five contracts, no bids were taken or received and on three occasions canteen funds were used as payment.

The university’s ethics policy states than an employee cannot engage in any business transaction in which an employee’s family member can profit from that employee’s position with the university.

n Group travel card

According to the audit, Smalls’ assistant used a group travel card that was issued to him when he previously served in the athletics department at S.C. State. A chart in the audit “details glaringly questionable charges to the card totaling $5,376.”

The chart illustrates the card was used to buy meals at both Orangeburg and Columbia restaurants and to purchase $799.27 in gas and $127.19 in flowers.

A description of the card’s intended use said its purpose was to benefit students, but no written policy governed the use of it.

The audit concluded the card should be canceled and S.C. State should be reimbursed for all non-business-related activity.

n Well-traveled Durango

The audit found the use of a Dodge Durango, bought by the finance department, was “a clear violation of state policy” because it was being driven for holiday trips and personal weekend activities, and to attend football games.

A state gas card was assigned to the vehicle, the audit states. Nine instances of weekend gas purchases were discovered during a review period from August 2006 to March 2007, including the weekends of two football games.

During the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays of 2006, gas was purchased five times. Three purchases were in Macon, Ga. The audit noted that Smalls’ assistant’s hometown is in Georgia.

Also noted in the audit was that two S.C. State employees saw Smalls’ assistant in possession of the Durango on Feb. 24, 2007, in Columbia, the same night he attended an event there.

n Free food?

The audit found that Smalls established a $10,000 open purchase order with Sodexho Dining Services, the company that provides food for the university’s dining halls.

“The Senior VP of Finance, his assistant, and other select members of his staff have been observed eating lunch on a regular basis using this purchase order as payment,” the audit states.

The purchase order was established using canteen funds. The audit recommended the S.C. State board adopt policies to govern use of these funds.

“That subject matter has been properly addressed and it is being followed,” Washington said.

n T&D Staff Writer Lee Tant can be reached at ltant@timesanddemocrat.com and 803-534-1060. Comment on this and other stories at www.TheTandD.com.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
24 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

concerned04 wrote on Jul 5, 2008 12:02 AM:

" I hope that the new president cleans this house of all this corruption. For far too long the SCSU family has protected each other in crisis situations.It is now time for "CHANGE". I would like the new president to check into government grants to see if the monies are actually going towards where it should be going, or if people are just satisfying small portions of the criteria and pocketing the rest of the monies. There should be enough grants out there to elevate the black communities in Orangeburg especially since there are two major colleges here. Instead we have folk using the system for personal gain and providing no help for the community. Change is badly needed!!!!! "

compaq wrote on Jul 3, 2008 4:44 PM:

" WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON, BIRDS OF A FEATHER, FLOCK TOGETHER, NEED I SAY MORE. "

Reasonable wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:37 PM:

" UNTIL SC STATE HIRES EMPLOYEES WITH "INTEGRITY," TO PERFORM THEIR ASSIGNED DUTIES, THIS WILL ALWAYS BE A PROBLEM. AS LONG AS THE INDIVIDUALS IN THE POSITION OF POWER, HAVE THE MENTALITY OF "SCRATCH MY BACK, AND I'LL SCRATCH YOURS," THIS PROBLEM WILL NEVER CEASE TO EXIST. THE ONLY TIME, PROBLEMS LIKE THIS ONE GET EXPOSED, IS WHEN, TOO MANY PEOPLE PUT THEIR HANDS IN THE "COOKIE JAR" OR WHEN ONE PERSON TRIES TO TAKE SOLE POSSESSION OF THE "COOKIE JAR." AS LONG AS NOBODY GETS TOO GREEDY, PROBLEMS LIKE THIS ONE, WILL ALWAYS BE "HUSH, HUSH!!!" "

misskitty2 wrote on Jul 2, 2008 3:39 PM:

" Nothing will change until you get someone to
operate the place who knows how to cut the cards and drop the hammer.The person who should have been cutting the cards failed to
do so and should have the hammer droped on him.The person to swing that hammer should be SOLICITOR DAVID PASCOE. "

concerned04 wrote on Jul 2, 2008 1:15 PM:

" When one drinks and drive and gets caught they should be charged with a DUI , when one points a gun at someone and gets caught they should be charged with assault with intent and in this case when one steals like these folk did, they should be charged with the appropriate charges also and let the punishment fit the crime like every other criminal. Or are they above the law? "

elcid87 wrote on Jul 2, 2008 12:19 PM:

" $34,693 contracts to Small's daughter
$31,000-_10,974.17(office supplies) = $20,025.83 Small's credit card
$5,000 Walmart gift cards (for how many people)
$879.92 Snacks
$118.19 Cologne
$5376. Smalls travel card questionable
Durango $????

Not including the contracts or the Durango, I come up with over thirty thousand dollars of questionable spending. Mr. Washington states,
"not everything in the audit is correct" and "any inapropriate actions have been dealt with." Is this John Smalls still employed by SCSU? Any respectful business or organization would have already terminated their relationship with Mr. Smalls if any of the alleged offenses were found to be correct. The one man who stood for what was right and requested an audit has been terminated and these offenses "have been dealt with". Wow, I am starting to agree with the Democrats. IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE. I hope your new president has a back bone and would request an audit if he feels it is needed to stop such shenanygans.
I wonder who all got to cash in on the free food fund and the gift cards. Was it all employees or just a select few. This is better than a soap opera. I can't wait to see the next episode. "

Bmore#1 wrote on Jul 2, 2008 9:38 AM:

" DOCTOR, those who tell don't know. And those who know won't tell. I mean what do we have here 6 of 1 and a half dozen of the other? It's done like this everywhere. Carolina, Morgan, Duke, The Real USC. Come on get the investigation over and done with ..... get rid of the wrong doer(s) if any and let's get that student body back on campus for a great school year and a MEAC championship in football. Nobody got time for this foolishness ... we got students to educate and games to win. GO DAWGS! "

fhsmct wrote on Jul 1, 2008 4:33 PM:

" confisus_sum, RE: your Jun 30, 2008 3:19 PM comments: when it alll comes out, you'll see that some action was taken but at least one of them who acted responsibly paid dearly . . . "

fhsmct wrote on Jul 1, 2008 4:31 PM:

" Former Bulldog and confisus_sum:

I can very confidently state that when (?if?) allllll the facts surrounding this come out, you're going to be very, very surprised, shocked and saddened.

Then, again, some may not be too overly surprised when the whos, whens, ancillary actions, etc, etc come into the light, if they ever do.

Let's simply say that some in positions of higher responsibility did what they were supposed to do, others countered it and the rest is what we've seen in the two articles to date.

There's a good amount of pecuniary liability surrounding this one but it remains to see if it will be adjudicated appropriately.

There's also at least two who should be given credit for doing the right thing throughout it all, one of whom it ended up costing greatly . . . "

dennis wrote on Jul 1, 2008 9:28 AM:

" wait a second, are the folk in question a part of the "establishment"? you know, the ones who give ric the job at the big house? look, for a long time the people have been talking about the activities at scsu but because the "establishment" looks-out for each other, nothing will be done. orangeburg is a tuff place to live and work. it's the little apple of the south. "

Former Bulldog wrote on Jun 30, 2008 6:36 PM:

" I am not surprised by this story, the rumors have been out there for years. What I am curious to know is how deep is this going to go? Did they check into the spending practices of every division on campus? I would also like to see the Commission on Higher Education do a little audit of the admissions office and their applications versus the university's admissions policy. When you see this kind of sudden growth, it usually means that some of the policies have been, shall we say, stretched. I'm with BossHog, fire the whole lot of VP's and Assistant VP's and put reputable people in place. I am shocked by what I have seen and heard about State over the past ten months. "

confisus_sum wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:19 PM:

" There is one other curious component to this story. Why was an audit that was conducted in May 07, and littered with obvious misconduct not acted upon by the administration. Surely the illustrious Board of Trustees had this information available to them. Is the culture so ingrained that instances such as the ones highlighted here go unnoticed? We are over one year removed from this audit, yet it has taken an outside entity to expose the corruption. "

potential student wrote on Jun 30, 2008 2:45 PM:

" Being a potential student for the fall admission, this story is very disheartening!
Aside from reading this article, of which was brought to my attention, by someone I had told that I was going to attend this university starting fall semester. Is very embrassing to say the least! First time and transfer students will be apprehensive about attending a university who mis-appropiate funds, especially student funds! I would not be surprised if the attendance rate drops. Every year for the past two years or so this university has been published in a negative light!!! Last year it was the housing situation, the school had taken incoming student money and then had no place for them to be housed! Now this year the blantant mis-use of student funds!!! Can you say: Find another school to attend, not fast but very fast!!! Repeated failures are not acceptable, especially when acquiring an education is so...expensive!!! The offenders deserve to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law...needless to say terminated!!! SC State is need of some house cleaning!!! When a person becomes too comfortable in a position and forgets for whom he/she is working for (key words...working for!) and gets sticky fingers...it's now time to go!!!! "

thelower40 wrote on Jun 30, 2008 1:40 PM:

" You can shoot the messinger,call it what ever you desire,the bottom line is some folks cannot be trusted with money.There will always be a thief who thinks he or she is some how entitled to the money in the till.Did any of these people have a SLED background check? To me and audit should be routine but not scheduled at a certain time.When you are holding public trust you should be beyond the appearance of wrong doing in all work activities.These moochers knew exactly what they were doing and thinking let the taxpayers pay for it.Lets clean house this time and send a message to anyone thinking about scamming over there. "

baldtiger wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:57 AM:

" Does SC State have any job openings? I'd like to get paid like these guys. "

elcid87 wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:56 AM:

" SCSU: ONCE AGAIN, YOU ARE YOUR OWN WORST ENEMY. SHAME ON THOSE WHO DID IT AND ANY WHO ALLOWED IT TO HAPPEN.

A system able to allow such fraud is very broken and needs to be repaired. It should not take an external audit to find such blantant stealing. Folks who were responsible to control such spending should be fired and the ones who stole from the state should be prosecuted. Someone should be made an example of. I feel sorrow for the many proud/outstanding graduates of SCSU who have to endure yet another scar on an otherwise fine instution. "

bosshogg wrote on Jun 30, 2008 7:04 AM:

" we are happy taht all of this is being exposed so that the new president will know exactly who to let go. here is a list of all that should go


all current VP's
all assistant Vp's
evelyn fields - faculty senate leader
sodexho
ed givens
just the beginning.... "

ICU81 wrote on Jun 29, 2008 6:34 PM:

" I know everybody will have torches lit ready to burn down the Times and democrat. The T&D can print articles that make you wonder sometimes. This time you can blame only the officials at SCSU. You know that you are a public state supported institution which means you can't take taxpayers money and spend it as you wish. The guilty need to be charged and the money needs to be returned to the school. "

confisus_sum wrote on Jun 29, 2008 3:47 PM:

" I agree with lsmoak. Somehow it will be the newspaper's fault, rather than those who use taxpayer money like it is their own. Designer clothes, flowers, gas, mont blanc pens, all out of state funds. Yet, there is so little planning that 100 rooms at $50.00 per night are having to be rented so students will have a place to sleep. I submit that the students could do a better job of running the institution. And I am not swayed by such lame arguments as, "well, it happens at other universities." That mentality just enables the cycle to continue. "

Chris' Cloths wrote on Jun 29, 2008 12:13 PM:

" SC State is not a bottomless money pit. This kind of garbage is unbelievable. Using SCSU finances to buy your own Christmas gifts. What kind of honer is that. No wonder Lowman isn't built if folks are rakin in the dough. There should be a full investgation by the state and the local FBI. This is people filling up their car and family members cars-allegedly. I am disgusted with the current administration. Whoever stole should be upheld by the fulliest extent of the law and thrown in jail. This could be the Halburton hustle but on a smaller scale. To anyone that has done this; Imagine if I take your wallet from you(and I can) and use your card to take out my lady and pay for trips. You were in Georgia on SCSU funds visiting yo mama. This administration is a joke. "

supporter wrote on Jun 29, 2008 11:52 AM:

" That's what I have been longing for - the facts. Little to no commentary from the news media is preferred - stick closer to the facts. No sensationalizing the headlines - just the facts. Provide direct quotes from the parties involved - just the facts! I appreciate factual stories - keep the emotion out of it! This article represents a better example of that since I don't believe the solicitor's office would not give the media trumped up information. The other story on board members' travel did not represent the "best" in reporting, in my judgment! "

got2know wrote on Jun 29, 2008 10:51 AM:

" Crooks,Crooks, and doing it in the name of the children.And now the board is bringing in some more questionable people to govern.I am weary about our new board members and their intentions. "

lsmoak wrote on Jun 29, 2008 9:13 AM:

" As in their previous article, I am sure there will be comments blaming the T&D for this. My comment to those is "Don't kill the messenger." The T&D is just reporting the facts. It would not be responsible reporting not to report the facts. "

fhsmct wrote on Jun 29, 2008 8:26 AM:

" Aaaaaaamazing!

Let’s see: give your child multiple no-bid contracts (are there no firms in SC competent to do the job?!), open a dining hall account so you & yours can eat on the college dime, buy your assistant a vehicle for personal use and give them a company card on which they buy gas, clothes, gift cards, etc, etc.

BUT, if you go by Smalls’ prior comments in the T&D: it’s all a vendetta by Hugine.

N~O~W, Brother Smalls is “Mr No Comment”.

AND, why is Washington commenting on these issues? Is it possible the audit points fingers at him and his? Not saying it does, not saying it doesn’t; just raising the possibility . . . /fhs/ "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News