* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• SWINE FLU: News, info & more
• DOLLARS & SENSE: Money-saving tips & more
• PET CORNER: News, SPCA listings & more
• T&D DATATRACK: Your source for in-depth news

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Who's raising race? The messages loaded into a McCain surrogate's words

By EUGENE ROBINSON  Thursday, August 07, 2008

1 comment(s) | Default | Large

I’m confident that Sen. Lindsey Graham and the rest of John McCain’s front-line surrogates know full well what messages they’re sending about Barack Obama and race. On the off chance that they — or, more likely, some of the white voters they’re trying to reach — don’t know text from subtext from context, here’s a deconstruction.

On Sunday, the exceedingly thin-skinned Graham was still shocked, saddened and outraged over Obama’s throwaway line, spoken days earlier, about not looking like previous presidents. Graham said on “Fox News Sunday” that “there’s no doubt in my mind that what Senator Obama is trying to suggest — that he’s a victim of something.” Graham later added, “We’re not going to run a campaign like he did in the primary. Every time somebody brings up a challenge to who you are and what you believe, ‘You’re a racist.’ That’s not going to happen in this campaign.”

The key words are “victim” and “racist” — which Obama did not say. Graham puts them in Obama’s mouth because of their power to alienate.

With the first loaded word, Graham is trying to tie Obama to a stereotype: the Great African-American Victim. He’s playing to the annoyance some whites feel at being reminded of racial sins committed long before they were born or even long before their families came to this country.

As Graham well knows, Obama has taken great pains to sanitize his campaign of even the faintest whiff of victimhood. He understands that in order to be elected president, he has to come off as the least-aggrieved black man in America.

Most of his supporters understand this, too. They know that he can’t react with anger when his love of country is questioned over a flag pin.

They see that he can’t be seen to take offense when his self-confidence — a quality shared by every U.S. senator I’ve ever met — is portrayed as arrogance, as if he had somehow reached beyond his station by thinking he is worthy to be elected president.

As the kerfuffle of the past week indicates, it’s apparently even problematic for Obama to attempt to describe the Republican Party’s obvious game plan of defining him as different, exotic and risky.

Obama could note, however, that the tactic doesn’t seem to be working.

A new poll by The Washington Post, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard University shows him leading McCain by 10 points, 47 percent to 37 percent, among white low-income workers. These people have to be made to fear or distrust Obama, and in a hurry, or McCain loses.

The second of the bombshell words that Obama didn’t say — but that Graham would like you to think he said — is an even bigger canard. He called me a racist has become a popular and convenient refuge of scoundrels. It’s the place, for example, where Geraldine Ferraro went to hide when she was challenged on her claim that Obama wouldn’t be where he was if he weren’t black.

In fact, as far as I’m aware, nobody called Ferraro a racist; to do so would imply knowledge of her most private thoughts, as well as a reassessment of her long career in public life.

Rather, what I and many others said was that her remarks were insulting and wrong — with the focus on what she had said, not on what was in her soul.

There’s an obvious difference, which Lindsey Graham surely understands. But on Sunday, when former senator — and current Obama supporter — Tom Daschle accurately reminded Graham that Obama “has never said that he believes that John McCain is a racist,” Graham wouldn’t acknowledge the point. As long as he doesn’t, it’s possible to create the false impression that

Obama accuses his critics of being racists.

This battle over Obama’s image as a black man is arguably the central front of the presidential campaign right now. Once-sharp lines between the candidates on issues such as withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq or allowing new offshore oil drilling are becoming blurred. The Democratic Party’s structural advantages going into the election are formidable. It’s hard to imagine how McCain could possibly win unless he generates doubt in voters’ minds about Obama.

One way to do that would be to fabricate the impression that Obama is demanding special treatment and privilege because he is black — in other words, turn a self-made man into a stereotypical beneficiary of affirmative action.

Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson@washpost.com.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
1 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

confisus_sum wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:55 PM:

" While I understand the T&D's loyalty to a former Orangeburg resident, I cannot understand allowing this person to turn every column into an apology for Obama's shortcomings. Robinson's devotion to his messianic candidate is heartwarming, but it certainly destroys his credibility as a writer. He refuses to concede Obama's failings, always deferring to some quasi-subliminal suggestion that Republicans are evil. One of the reason the lines are blurred is due to his candidate's penchant for flip flopping on issues. Another reason may be his candidate's unwillingness to debate Senator McCain. In regards to McCain not being able to win unless he places doubts about Obama, that statement is ludicrous. Not only do the polls prove this to be untrue, but Obama's campaign itself is using age discrimination to place doubts about McCain, exactly what Robinson accuses McCain of doing. Hypocrisy at its finest. I sincerely hope that the T&D will choose to devote equal time in their opinion columns to pro-McCain columnists, but I am afraid it will take weeks of them to equal the free print ads offered to Obama via Robinson. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

More Opinion