* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• SWINE FLU: News, info & more
• DOLLARS & SENSE: Money-saving tips & more
• PET CORNER: News, SPCA listings & more
• T&D DATATRACK: Your source for in-depth news

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Neighborhood goes to the dogs

 Friday, August 22, 2008

2 comment(s) | Default | Large

I an a retired California lawyer living in the city of Orangeburg with my friend and mortgagor, Biaggia Crucilla, since December of 2005.

Throughout this time I have been putting up with a neighbor’s eight to 10 dogs and the out-of-control barking he allows even though there is a sign across the street stating, “Noise Ordinance Strictly Enforced.” After several unsuccessful attempts to quiet them by calling Orangeburg Public Safety (e.g., the police) in 2006, I worked out an uneasy truce with my neighbor during 2007.

This year he acquired a new dog that sounds worse than a barking seal.

Having had enough, I looked up the city and county ordinances and found both nuisance and barking dog ordinances. I also started videotaping, causing another neighbor to retaliate by getting four dogs. I contacted the chief of Public Safety, Wendell Davis, and City Administrator John Yow, requesting that they broker a workable solution to what was becoming an ugly and volatile neighborhood conflict.

The chief, one of his captains, the animal control officer, my neighbors, Ms. Crucilla and I attempted and informal “mediation.” Things were very tense and hostile on my neighbors’ side. Ms. Crucilla and I left believing things were unlikely to change, and they haven’t.

On April 15 I appeared before City Council imploring them to pass an ordinance like the one on the books in my hometown of San Marino, Calif., limiting each household within the city limits to no more than three dogs per household. The council indicated they would study the matter and reach a decision in the summer. I needn’t tell you that they reached the wrong decision. Tucker Lyon’s story covering that meeting appeared the following day. I also provided my support to Mr. John Cruise at the following council meeting, at which he also complained that the barking dog ordinances aren’t being adequately enforced.

On June 5 my next-door neighbor was fined by the municipal court judge and her father was fined $100 for contempt of court. I thought this would discourage my other neighbor from permitting his dogs to bark wildly. I was wrong, and that neighbor went to municipal court this month with Ms. Crucilla and me as chief witnesses against him.

The outcome before the same judge was an about-face. This neighbor was found not guilty with the judge’s reasoning essentially being “dogs will bark.”

This neighborhood has gone to the dogs, literally. I have reviewed the ordinances and zoning ordinances from start to finish. There are already restrictions which, in effect, limit each household to no more than three dogs in an A2 Residential Zone. The city administrator has indicated, however, that the council is unlikely to enforce this ordinance if it results in a forfeiture. If anything, he went on, the council is likely to repeal these ordinances, even though I live in a densely populated area and dog kennels are and should be prohibited.

I will be appearing before the council again to make the point.

-- Jeffrey Paul McMorrow, Esq. Orangeburg

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
2 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

justask wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:58 AM:

" Maybe you should contact WISTV news or WLTX and then maybe the people in Orangeburg would be more than willing to listen. That is exactly why I am a former resident due to the rules and regulations being followed according to who you know and not the law. "

Jeffrey Paul wrote on Aug 25, 2008 11:40 AM:

" My friend, Mr. McMorrow and I “had our day in court.” We live in a neighborhood where the houses are so close together that I could disturb my neighbor simply by shutting my door or starting my car. How can someone be allowed to have so many dogs?

The animal control officer and the Chief of Police had already labeled these dogs a nuisance and informed my neighbors of the laws.
After today’s ruling my neighbors will continue allowing their dogs to bark without making the least effort to quiet them down.

I know that dogs bark and I cannot have the barking cease completely; but as a citizen, can I not call upon the city to enforce its laws without feeling oppressed? The court’s rulings were inconsistent, and whether I can find relief through the courts or the council is in doubt. It seems to me that since I keep complaining about this issue, I now have become the nuisance: a citizen who would like peace and quiet in the neighborhood and the laws enforced and upheld to maintain them.

I am a teacher and teach my students that the law of the land will be upheld, that they should become good citizens and that they should stand up for their rights. I have shared my personal legal challenges with my students, and they will be curious to hear of the outcome. How should I explain it?

Ms. B.J. Crucilla "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

More Opinion