Obama out of touch with S.C. voters
By KATON DAWSON Friday, August 29, 2008No presidential candidate in history is more out of touch with South Carolina voters than the first-term liberal from Illinois and new Democratic nominee Sen. Barack Obama.
Over the course of presidential primary season, South Carolina voters met face-to-face with presidential candidates to discuss the issues most important to our state. But Obama neglected to listen to the needs of South Carolinians.
Obama cemented his celebrity status on a midsummer world tour. Jet-setting from Baghdad to Berlin, Obama struck priceless poses for paparazzi and played pickup basketball in areas of the world that would have been too dangerous to visit if his own efforts to cut funding for our men and women in uniform had been successful.
Obama can deny it, but the troop surge backed by John McCain and South Carolina’s Republican leadership has been successful. Violence is down in Iraq. The country is on track to security and stability. Obama may be proud to stand with radical anti-war liberals who have campaigned against America’s effort to win the war on terror. But men and women in uniform from South Carolina deserve a commander-in-chief like John McCain who is proud to stand with them in the fight to defeat radical Islamic terrorists.
As he crisscrossed the world on taxpayer-funded flights, Obama became insulated from the record high gas prices that are affecting South Carolina families and business. Republicans recognize the burden of skyrocketing fuel costs, and they have urged Democrats including Obama to find solutions to high gas prices. But time after time, Obama has said no. He opposed domestic oil drilling. He opposed nuclear energy development. He opposed almost every effort to expand energy production at home.
Instead of bringing together leaders from both parties this summer to bring down fuel costs, Obama told South Carolinians to check their tire pressure and get a tune-up before he went body surfing in Hawaii on a vacation. While Obama was on vacation, Republicans worked hard to find real solutions to energy costs. Despite Obama’s absence in leadership, gas prices have come down slightly, but there is still more work to be done -- if the Do-Nothing Democrat Congress will allow a vote on energy legislation this year.
Obama saw the American economy slow as he geared up to run for president. In South Carolina, he met small business owners and hardworking parents who asked for meaningful tax relief. Yet, Obama proposes to raise income taxes and payroll taxes and nearly double taxes on capital gains.
This year, Obama voted in favor of the Democrats’ FY 2009 budget, which would raise taxes for South Carolinians earning $42,000 or more – one of Obama’s more than 90 votes in favor of higher taxes in the U.S. Senate. Higher taxes equal less money in the pockets of South Carolina families to spend on goods and services throughout the state and less money to stimulate the economy.
Earlier this year, Obama insulted thousands of South Carolinians by claiming that working-class voters cling to their religion and guns to feel better when times get tough. If Obama had truly listened to voters he met in South Carolina, he would have known that hardworking South Carolina voters are guided by faith and believe deeply in individual liberty -- from the sanctity of every human life to the right to own firearms. If Obama is elected president, he would have the power to appoint activist judges who share his radical world view. Obama’s judicial appointees would have to pass the MoveOn.org litmus test of upholding abortion on-demand, gay marriage in America and strict gun control.
The reality is that Obama is a celebrity who as president will be the voice of elitists from Hollywood to the Hamptons rather than an advocate for hardworking voters from Summerville to Spartanburg. And South Carolina voters deserve better. Obama will follow in the footsteps of history’s other liberal, out-of-touch presidential hopefuls like Walter Mondale, Mike Dukakis and John Kerry to landslide defeat in South Carolina.
Katon Dawson is chairman of the S.C. Republican Party.
To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

fhsmct wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:12 PM:
Since when did a probably orchestrated call in and email campaign force Oprah Winfrey to have someone on her show?
Last I checked, it's the Oprah Winfrey Show and she has final say on who is invited to appear on her show.
She has never hidden her support for Senator Obama (she openly endorsed him at the earliest stage of his career) and the occasional bit of controversy has usually helped, not hindered her ratings and endorser/advertiser support.
If she so choses to deal with the effect and affect of possibly not having Senator McCain on, then that's her choice in this land we claim is a free country.
Connor:
The truth will set you free. Native Orangeburger EUGENE Robinson's WashPost based column runs twice weekly (Tuesdays and Fridays), not daily.
Per the Washington Post website:
"Eugene Robinson is an Associate Editor and twice-weekly columnist for The Washington Post. His column appears on Tuesdays and Fridays."
Then, again, why let a li'l thing like a verifiable fact get in the way of emotion?
2 days out of 7 (28%) is a far cry from "virtually every day".
[RE: connor wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:15 AM: "Virtually every day we read Gene Robinson rant on and on with "slease" reporting of McCain and now Palin." ]. . . "
scmom2008 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:10 PM:
reddawg wrote on Sep 5, 2008 6:52 PM:
tiger man wrote on Sep 5, 2008 3:58 PM:
confisus_sum wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:28 PM:
Santee32 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 11:53 AM:
Republicans join us in letting a real person take the position. "Barack Obama"! "Barack Obama"! "Barack Obama"! "
elcid wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:33 AM:
I am thankful for the many wonderful, non-racist fiolks I have met here and sincerely hope what I have been reading here is not a true representation of Orangeburg reality. If it is, all the chuches I see as I travel have a lot of work to do. I love you all. "
confisus_sum wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:11 AM:
BIG DILEMMA: OPRAH BALKS AT HOSTING SARAH PALIN; STAFF DIVIDED
Fri Sep 05 2008 08:55:46 ET
Oprah Winfrey may have introduced Democrat Barack Obama to the women of America -- but the talkshow queen is not rushing to embrace the first woman on a Republican presidential ticket!
Oprah's staff is sharply divided on the merits of booking Sarah Palin, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.
"Half of her staff really wants Sarah Palin on," an insider explains. "Oprah's website is getting tons of requests to put her on, but Oprah and a couple of her top people are adamantly against it because of Obama."
One executive close to Winfrey is warning any Palin ban could ignite a dramatic backlash!
It is not clear if Oprah has softened her position after watching Palin's historic convention speech.
Last year, Winfrey blocked an appearance by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, timed to a promotional tour of his autobiography.
Oprah and executive producer Sheri Salata, who has contributed thousands of dollars to Obama's campaign, refused requests for comment. "
connor wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:15 AM:
ONE ARTICLE is printed in support of John McCain and making some attacks on Obama and Obama supporters are suddenly self-righteously bemoaning the audacity of how anyone could critize Obama. 11 comments about Dawson's one editorial, but nothing about Gene Robinson's vicious personal attacks.
Think: During and after the Democratic Conv. the T and D ran article after article praising Obama. The editorials were all the Gene Robinson type: Worship of Obama as the second coming of the Messiah. Not a word of negative coverage. THEN CAME THE REP CONV. The day after McCain's speech the two editorials were lambasting both McCain and Palin. Does anyone notice that the T and D, like most media outlets is clearly not "favoring" Obama by allowing one article from the other point of view?
Look, let's start showing just a bit of intellectual honesty in all of this. Both sides deserve to be heard. Though I prefer McCain to Obama: If all I saw were praising articles of McCain and negative smears of Obama I would question the objectivity of the source. I want to hear both sides and make a rationale decision about the most important leader in the world.
Let's all get off the Robinson smear band-wagon and begin discussing the issues. If, in the end, Obama is the more qualified (experience, ideas, etc.) candidate, so be it. However, for the sake of our children lets quit ranting on and on the minute anyone says one word criticizing Obama or praising McCain. This is getting ridiculous. "
enough_already wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:44 AM:
Are the Republicans actually trying to take credit for lowering the price of gas. That has to be the a joke. Under the Republican administration the price of gas has doubled in the last two years not to mention the "surge" in gas prices just this past year. Where were the Republicans when this was happening. But we can't blame Katone Dawson for writing this article; he was just doing his job the way that the Republican party wants it done. Everybody knows that the Republican party wants you to follow them blindly and not ask questions. "
orangeburger wrote on Sep 4, 2008 8:46 PM:
ANNUAL wrote on Sep 4, 2008 3:46 PM:
confisus_sum wrote on Sep 4, 2008 3:32 PM:
mannyb72 wrote on Sep 4, 2008 1:29 PM:
Have never regretted leaving. Not even one day.
That article is exactly what I expect to see in print in The T and D. Manny B. "
Pitbull wrote on Sep 4, 2008 11:38 AM:
captivated wrote on Sep 4, 2008 7:31 AM:
mjbyars wrote on Sep 3, 2008 4:43 PM:
McCain is 100% anti-woman as his quarter-century record indicates.
He supports tax cuts for the richest 3,030,000 people.
McCain wants to stay in Iraq for 100 years, maybe 1,000.
McCain also has voted with Bush 98% of the time.
McCain is out of touch with America based on his voting record. "
fhsmct wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:46 AM:
How else are we to pay for that debt other than, regretably, an increase in taxes?
If memory serves me well, and it does, the current administration began it's 1st term inheriting a budget surplus. That evaporated faster than rubbing alcohol on a hot summer day!
It was NOT the Illinois Senator who is the cause of a 1 - 1 ratio of contract personnel to military personel, mostly employees and sub contractors of former employers (Brown Root and Halliburton) of the current sitting VPOTUS and headquartered in the state the current sitting POTUS is a former governor of.
How someone can say or imply that the Illinois Senator is the cause of high gas prices is beyond common sense.
And, absence in leadership; Missed Votes during the current Senate:
Obama 290 votes (45.5%)
McCain 407 votes (63.8%)
Also, himself being a former POW, how in all good conscious can McCain support such known torture techniques as waterboarding, et al, as well as his having backed the past several years federal budget proposals that called for a reduction in the V.A. budget at a time when the wounded veteran population is rapidly growing and he has supported a reduction in benefits for currently serving soldiers, Marines, airmen and sailors!
Next time you see a currently serving service member w/ a family, ask them what their medical co-pay was last year versus now!
Yep, it's surrrrrrrre in the Senator from Illinois . . . "
wagreen1 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:05 AM:
confisus_sum wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:41 AM:
scu812 wrote on Sep 3, 2008 7:42 AM:
The majority of South Carolina residents know the hardship that has been placed on their shoulders by the current administration.
It's not about the personalities, it's the plan!
The people still have the power. It's called voting.
Please register to vote,then email, call or write your elected officials and tell them they were elected find solutions to our problems. "
Chris' Cloths wrote on Sep 2, 2008 9:25 PM:
orangeburger wrote on Sep 2, 2008 8:01 PM:
grateful wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:56 PM:
grateful wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:52 PM:
mjkaster@windstream.net wrote on Aug 30, 2008 6:50 AM:
Max J. Kaster, Past Chairman
Calhoun County Republican Party "