* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• THE TICKET: Showtimes, reviews, games & more
• DINING GUIDE:Your source for T&D Region restaurants
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• PET CORNER: Your home for news and PET IDOL
Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do we "need" state troopers?

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

10 comment(s) | Default | Large

On Tuesday, Sept. 16, I witnessed something very disturbing to me. There were three state troopers who were pulling people over left and right as fast as they could, one right after another, and giving them tickets.

This occurred on St. Matthews Road near the Regional Medical Center. In a 25-minute period, I saw six separate pull-overs. I believe the citations were for seat belt violations.

As I was approaching one of the troopers who was parked in the median, I saw him cast a laser beam-like stare at the driver of the car in front of me. A few minutes later as I talked to the receptionist at one of the doctor’s offices, she confirmed to me that one of her patients had indeed been cited for a seat belt violation. In case you are wondering, I didn’t get a ticket.

This may sound radical to you, but perhaps we should consider abolishing the state trooper system. In my 28 years of driving, covering some 700,000 miles, I’ve never had a need for one.

And let me tell you something, it’s not the government’s responsibility or obligation to continue to provide them or any government employee with a job. What I’m saying is that from time to time, we need to re-evaluate all government agencies to determine whether or not they are sill viable, whether they continue to be cost-effective. Are they truly needed and have they become too powerful and oppressive to the freedoms of the American citizen?

Something that really concerns me is the idea of where do these people and organizations get their power. Do they just make up their own rules as they go along? As a voter and taxpayer, I don’t recall ever being consulted on any laws or policies put into effect by them, yet I’m paying their salary and providing them with the tools to carry out their mission. Can you imagine the millions and millions of dollars it costs each year to pay these salaries, and for the cars they drive, and for the gas they burn, and for the upkeep on their vehicles, and for the buildings they meet in, and for the utilities of that building and the salaried employees there? Untold millions each and every year and that’s just for the state of South Carolina!

If we do continue to have the state trooper system, I think it should be largely reduced. There are a couple of key phrases I’d like to see incorporated into the vocabulary and psyche of the officers. They are “clear and present danger” and “gross violation.” In order for an officer to institute a stop, the offending driver needs to be doing something so bad that there’s no doubt he or she needs to be pulled over. I’m talking about going more than 15 mph over the speed limit or driving extremely recklessly.

Not wearing a seat belt does not qualify as a “clear and present danger” or a “gross violation.” I hate wearing a seat belt and want the law to be repealed. I can’t stand too much restriction, whether it be from a physical belt or from a government law. Also the fines and points penalty system for traffic violations is way too severe and needs to be drastically reduced. Officers and politicians need to remember that we the American citizens are their bosses. We pay their salaries and they work for us.

I know it’s aggravating and most of us don’t have or want to take the time to do it, but we need to contact our elected officials on this issue. We all just want to live free and enjoy life without all of the hassles. However, I’m afraid of what this country will become if we simply stand by in silence while these entities continue to make more rules, laws and restrictions that oppress us. Every proposed law must be weighed on the scales of freedom. Politicians should always take into account the Constitution, Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights as well as the teachings of our founding fathers when passing laws and making decisions.

In the year 1759, founding father and signer of the Declaration of Independence Benjamin Franklin said this: They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Now put that in your pipe and smoke on it for awhile.

-- Vernon Davis, Orangeburg

 
10 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

gone fishing wrote on Sep 30, 2008 1:25 PM:

" I have been driving for 40 years and have had one ticket. I deserved it. I was speeding!! My husband drives a truck and has not had a ticket in more than 15 years and that one was for sleeping on the shoulder of the road. Yes we need state troopers and yes we need the seat belt law for just such dummies as you. Set the example that children can follow. Everyone of my grand childern buckle up and they remind their parents to also. Learn from the little ones. Suck it up and obey the law and then you won't have to worry about the troopers because it won't be you parked in front of one. "

confisus_sum wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:39 AM:

" While I disagree with the opening premise of this letter, I do agree with the underlying theme. The example given does less to illustrate the writer's point, than it does to stir angry responses. However, it should be all citizens responsibility to constantly evaluate the level of government intrusion. While certain laws on the surface seem to benefit the common good, they unfortunately are never constrained, therefore breeding an overzealous government, intent on dictating our every move. For those that think that is an absurd proposal, all you must do is consider the ludicrous redistribution of wealth that they called a "Bailout" of Wall Street. "

captivated wrote on Sep 30, 2008 7:18 AM:

" As radical as it may sounds, I believe Mr. Davis' point has merit, as least economically. It has to be very expensive to maintain and operate a state police force to patrol our highways, especially since we have county and city police that patrol the same roads like 601 and 301. I used to think that the state police were supposed to restrict their operations to interstate highways like 26, 20 and 95, but more and more and , like the incident Mr. Davis wrote about, they are on city and county roads. If we were to extend jurisdiction for county police to interstate roadways in the county they represent, there would be no need for state policemen and we would save a lot of money. And, with the present and future budget cuts, would this not be a good thing? "

dho3rd wrote on Sep 29, 2008 5:05 PM:

" I hope and pray that you will never need a State Trooper. But, by chance, should you ever receive a knock at the door in the middle of the night and the voice on the other side says "State Trooper, sorry but your loved one is DEAD and through our investigation a drunk killed them and we have them in jail." You might be a little thankful that the State Trooper was there.
Are there changes that need to be made yes! But eliminating the Troopers is not the agency that needs to go. A law is the law. Cuss the legislature that passed it. Trooper enforce the laws passed by them. No I am not a Trooper, but I am a cop! "

lovehim wrote on Sep 29, 2008 7:11 AM:

" Honestly I'm not suprised that someone would write something like the comment refuring to the State Trropers. Today people seem to be overcome with idioacy everytime i turn around i hear people saying litterly saying "f### the police" in there songs, on road sides it's ridiculous. These men and women go out here everyday and put there lives on the line to protect us and our rights. Also, if you don't think that we need State Troopers next time yu decide not to wear your seatbelt and get in an accident clean yourself off the asphalt and save our State Troopers a call. To those who want to say "f*** the police" next time you get robbed, got "baby momma drama", problems with your in-laws whatever your issue, we'll see how much you're downing them then. Thank you to the men and women who go out here everyday and put your lives on the line to keep our roads safe, and keep our families coming home. "

traveler wrote on Sep 29, 2008 12:14 AM:

" I ,for one, would like to know what you have been putting in your pipe and smoking ???
We need more of these dedicated public servants to be on our roads and highways enforcing the laws that are in place.
The tax dollars that pay their salaries and the material requirements for this state department to be able to do their job is money very well spent.In fact, considering the lack of respect that these officers deal with on a daily basis, they are highly underpaid!
I would question your concern in stopping violators of the law. These people need to be stopped and reminded that there are law abiding citizens on the road who care about their own lives as well as the lives of others.
What is the big issue against seatbelts anyway; that they wrinkle one's clothes? Better wrinkled than cut of by emergency room personnel who have to doctor on someone who was too foolish to fasten up !
Sometimes laws have to be into place to take care of those lacking the common sense to make appropriate calls regarding personal safety. "

elloree wrote on Sep 28, 2008 3:31 PM:

" State troopers are very much needed, however some of them make bad choices and abuse their power. (this is nothing new, many profession abuse their powers) The seatbelt law however is a different story, and should not be a law. If motorist are too stupid to recognize that this is a life saving device, then let them die. This is the harsh reality, but it is the truth. Law enforcement have more thing to do other than monitor rather or not motorist are wearing seatbelt. "

PhoneHome wrote on Sep 26, 2008 9:06 PM:

" You have got to be kidding me. I have been driving for 40 yrs. and have never gotten a ticket I did not deserve. I wish we did not have the seat belt laws, but I know the reason why. It is because people like you are too stubborn to realize that seat belts, save lives. This is not an opinion it is a fact. When you do not wear yours, you not only put your own life in danger, but you also set a bad example to others in your family. "

purecnty wrote on Sep 25, 2008 10:40 AM:

" Having driving for almost 30 years I have to disagree with you. I have been on the receiving end of those tickets before, but I knew I broke the law. I don't know that I have ever been treaded unfair by any state trooper.
I believe we need more of them not less. They have a tough job, and in doing there job, they ruffle a lot of feathers.
If you every saw an accident on the interstate in bad weather, they are there. If they didn't do there duty there would be a lot more accidents. They also go up against people who are armed hand have to make decisions that you could not make.
If you don't like the seat belt law, change it. Don't get mad at the troopers who enforce the law. There are probably tired of scraping people off the pavement who don't wear them.

The next time you see a trooper you should thank them for there hard thankless work.

Who how many times they pulled drunk drivers off the road, so you didn't end up in an accident. "

brunettelady wrote on Sep 23, 2008 11:57 AM:

" I bet you like to drink and drive as well. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

More Opinion