* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• SWINE FLU: News, info & more
• DOLLARS & SENSE: Money-saving tips & more
• PET CORNER: News, SPCA listings & more
• T&D DATATRACK: Your source for in-depth news

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Socializing America

 Saturday, October 11, 2008

8 comment(s) | Default | Large

How did we get where we are and where do we go from here? It is obvious that our government shares much more of a burden of responsibility than Wall Street for the economic crisis that our country is enduring.

This crisis is a result of many years of Washington’s excessive spending, an array of legislative mandates and government involving itself in the financing of the housing industry. The privatization of Fannie Mae (1968) and Freddie Mac (1970) by a liberal Congress with no regulation, no oversight and no income taxes to pay on their profits basically gave these two institutions a blank checkbook (no limit) to create chaos in our nation’s economy.

In 1977, to add fuel to the fire of an already spiraling debt of home financing, the liberals in Congress passed the “Community Reinvestment Act,” which mandated that our banks make substandard, high-risk loans to many who, unfortunately, could not afford to repay them. One can easily see that those three programs where trillions of dollars have been loaned constituted a recipe for disaster from the beginning. Undoubtedly, they will go down in history as the nation’s greatest financial rip-off of the taxpayers.

Several decades of this activity along with runaway, out-of-control government spending, excessive regulation and congressional dictates have now led to a crisis so critical that Congress, at the urging of the president, passed a $700 billion rescue bill to hopefully avert an economic catastrophe.

All of the above and many other liberal legislative congressional actions are presented to us as the “genius” of government in Washington. They really believe that we are so inept that they must tax and spend our money to make our lives better.

It is obvious with the economic crisis our country is facing, the liberal Washington legislators who write and pass these laws, though well intended, have lost their economic compass. They seem to be oblivious to the fact that our workers have to compete in a global economy. The more mandates and taxes they put on the backs of American workers and our economy, the harder it is to maintain a competitive edge against workers from other countries. Unfortunately, if the current trend continues, we may end up with laws that were intended to enhance our lives resulting in exactly the opposite!

We may wake up one day with volumes of fancy laws written on paper in Washington only to realize that jobs have been shipped to other counties around the world. Our government should focus on providing an environment that unshackles the burden of congressional dictates, excessive taxes and regulations so that American workers can be free to have the opportunity to compete with the rest of the world on a level playing field in this global economy.

There is no doubt that we are still the greatest country on earth. However, one has to wonder if the current economic crisis that we are experiencing might be our last warning to reverse the liberal agenda of socializing America before it’s too late. That is, if it is not already too late!

– O’Neal Laird, Lexington

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
8 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

confisus_sum wrote on Oct 18, 2008 6:18 PM:

" To sum this argument up, nearly 10 TRILLION dollars has been taken from the working American taxpayer and given away in the form of welfare. That is the equivalent of $225,000 per person living in poverty. But the issue is not the welfare recipients, many of whom legitimately need assistance, but with a federal bureaucracy that has shown that it is incapable of being run efficiently. How much of that $225,000 do you think actually was recieved by those it was intended for? Conversly, private donations to charitable entities totalled $295 billion in 2006 alone. It seems that it would make sense for the government to get out of the welfare business and let private companies show them how it is done. The American people are obviously showing a propensity to help their neighbor. "

orangeburger wrote on Oct 15, 2008 12:06 PM:

" Ya'll, Community reinvestment act did not say that you have to take people off the street with no income and give them $300K homes they cannot afford. If the spirit of the plan was understood correctly, money would have been spent on small loans to make people self reliant( a good example is Grameen Bank in Bangladesh). Both Republican and democratic politcians have been very guilty of decimating the local industries, disrupting local supply chains, giving tax credits for exporting mid level and high tech jobs to outside countries. We have also killed all demand for local specailised manpower such as science and math graduates by allowing rampant abuse of H1-B visa program to import rather poor quality inexpensive labor from evey corner of the world. . The politicians of both color have been deviant, negligent, extremely corrupt. If the citizens of this country understood the 2nd amendment of the constitution correctly, we need to be take cudgels(arms) against the politicians by calling them to account for the severe harm they have caused this country from bribery and corruption. They need to be sued in every court of this country. Ted Stevens of Alaska is a just an old poster child for corruption. What goes on between lobbyists and the senators, congressmen, is the most eggregious but legalized form of corruption. I doubt that any of the presidential candidates have the balls to say "to he** with lobbyists and that lobbying for favors would be made illegal" The market pundits and of course both the presidential candidates are crying hoarse that 1:30 leverage of markets is obnoxious! Understand this. A lobbyist can throw under a million dollars at a political campaign and get 3 billion worth of returns ( example the Energy mafia working with Dick Cheney)..Politicians are no saints. They are just as greedy and self centered as most humans are. Keeping them in check is the citizen's business. In this country whether it is the Bible or the constitiution we really excel in "literal interpretation". What we need to understand is the spirit of our constitution- Stuff that is not taught in schools! "

skyler 6 wrote on Oct 15, 2008 11:50 AM:

" I'm going to have to make this quick,the Dems and President Obama are going to make life different. The GOP and all you Conservative losers will be given a period of time to try to understand what just happen. In the end We win and you lose. "VOTE OBAMA/BIDEN 08". "

bravo14sc wrote on Oct 15, 2008 11:04 AM:

" I agree with you about Socialism. We are drifting from the Republic that we used to be. I am sad to see the direction of this country. "

confisus_sum wrote on Oct 14, 2008 7:30 AM:

" Obama yesterday rolled out another set of proposals for dealing with the economic crisis.

The plan includes an arrangement with banks that would include a 90-day moratorium on foreclosures for many homeowners.

In February, after Hillary Clinton proposed a similar foreclosure moratorium, the Los Angeles Times reported that Obama condemned her plan:

"In San Antonio on Tuesday, Obama said that Clinton’s foreclosure freeze was potentially “disastrous,” rewarding “people who made this problem worse”."

Do we really need a President that has so little confidence in his own decisions that he must devise strategy based on public opinion polls? This is not change, and it sure is not leadership. Vote NOBAMA '08 "

confisus_sum wrote on Oct 13, 2008 10:09 AM:

" * Under Jimmy Carter we received the Community Reinvestment act. This law says banks have to make loans in low income areas and it has forced many lending institutions to seek to make loans to people in areas that lenders would not normally go because of the risk and low property values.(Sub Prime Loans). This was in 1977. In 1980 president Carter and a Democratic controlled congress passed the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act-- The law also removed the power of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors under the Glass-Steagall Act and Regulation to set the interest rates of savings accounts. A Sad fact is we are all still feeling the effects of his policies and decisions 30 years later.
* Then in 1995, Bill Clinton,(in between interns) made changes to the Community Reinvestment Act, that forced an increase in the number of loans to these people and the aggregate dollar amounts loaned.-- Larger loans to people with less income in areas where the collateral value would go down instead of up.( Clinton should have had his mind on the long range effects of this instead of Monica and a good cigar.) This was in response to pressure from "community organizer." Can you think of a former Community organizer running for president? Hint - he's a Democrat
* In 1999 Mr. Clinton signed to repeal the Glass-Steagall act which had protected taxpayers since the Great Depression.
* In 2003 President Bush tried to propose a change in regulatory control over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and place both companies under the control of the Department of the Treasury, but was voted down by the liberal democrats led by Barney Frank. Remember the name Barney Frank, he is one of Obama’s top two economic advisors the other is Jim Johnson who was the head of Freddie Mac and walked away with $24,000,000.
* Now, Mr. Obama and his liberal cronies are spinning the facts so you will believe that all our financial problems are because of Bush's failed economic policy. However, OBAMA’S two MOST TRUSTED ECONOMIC ADVISERS TO HIS CAMPAIGN are the very people that were in control of Freddie Mac- Jim Johnson $24,000,000 and Fannie Mae - Franklin Raines $90,000,000 in 6 years).
In addition, since 1989 their have been several politicians who have received campaign donations and kick backs from these two failed institutions. The #1 recipient is Senator Chris Dodd-D RI and the runner up is none other than Senator Barrack Obama who received the second largest amount of donations (over $500 ,000) which is phenomenal because he has only been in the Senate for 3 years. Why is the news media not reporting these things? More importantly, why are the American people allowing this to happen? "

confisus_sum wrote on Oct 13, 2008 9:58 AM:

" A very well researched and written letter. The points made are being conveniently disregarded by the liberal media. "

Darla wrote on Oct 12, 2008 8:37 AM:

" I totally agree, and to articulate a fact, it will get worst before it gets better due to the liberal media praising and worshiping the liberal congress and its handling of government affairs thereby brainwashing the countless stupid Americans that know no better and refuses to look behind the curtain of corruption. If we as Americans don’t wake up soon, we will have the rug pulled from us so fast socialism will become a way of life. I’m darn mad! "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

More Opinion