* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Four seek Calhoun school board seat

By TUCKER LYON, T&D Government Writer  Tuesday, October 21, 2008

5 comment(s) | Default | Large

CAMERON - With much of Calhoun County at odds over the controversial $32 million-plus school district construction plan already underway, the nonpartisan Nov. 4 school board election could serve as a referendum of sorts.

Four candidates are seeking the Calhoun County School Board District 1 seat. Incumbent Gary Porth, who has served on the board for more than a dozen years, is being challenged by three political newcomers opposed to the construction plan. Tommie J. Glover, Melody Inabinet Pedings and Scott Segars are the challengers.

Porth, who is seeking a fourth four-year term from District 1, also represented District 4 for one term, before losing a re-election bid in 1992.

The three-member board majority, which includes Porth, has supported a $32 million bond issue that will allow the construction of a new K-8 school in St. Matthews, additions for a K-8 school in Sandy Run and improvements to the high school. Opponents cite a lack of input from the community, with some upset over the closing of John Ford and Guinyard schools.

District 1 includes the precincts of Cameron, Midway and Creston, as well as portions of Fort Motte, Lone Star, St. Matthews and Dixie. The district has 1,869 registered voters, of whom 1,032 are white, 831 are black and six are designated “other.”

Gary PorthRunning on his record, Porth says he’s “ecstatic” about the school district’s recent accomplishments, including leading the state in three-year gains in test scores.

“It’s hard to describe how I feel about that,” he said “Truly the teachers are doing a really good job and the students have bought into the system. It’s a districtwide, community effort. ... We’ve just done phenomenally well.”

And not only has the district made tremendous strides in education, Porth stresses all of the progress has been done, “with one of the most attractive tax rates in the state.”

“Things are in better shape under (Superintendent Kenneth Westbury’s) leadership than in my entire time on the board. He’s a local product, he’s easy to get along with and he’s put competent people in place,” Porth said. “It’s the best shape we’ve ever had.”

With that kind of success, Porth says, he doesn’t understand the opposition.

“I saw a brochure of Mr. Glover’s and I was taken aback,” Porth said, citing a grammatical error. “I can speak slang with the absolute best of them ... but, if I put out a brochure for office, I’d make sure it was grammatically correct.”

Otherwise, Porth says his record speaks to the fiscal issues raised by Glover.

Noting that Pedings is a distant relative, Porth says she’s, “obviously a very, very strong advocate and a big volunteer in the schools. ... She’s very passionate about the schools.”

But, he says, that passion can focus on one issue rather than, “seeing the whole picture. ... I question whether she can see the district as a whole.” The voucher issue is one in which she’s, “adamant about us signing some form,” that doesn’t concern the county or the board and “has been killed in the legislature.”

As for Segars, Porth says he’s a good friend of Board Chairman Tom Arant.

“Both profess to be Libertarians. Tom got him to run for the board to further their cause,” Porth said.

Acknowledging that there has been a, “big outpouring about the building project,” Porth says, “the students’ needs are being met, without burdening taxpayers with overwhelming debt.”

“There’s been no referendum in my tenure. No debt,” he said. “I’d have been adamantly opposed to $32 million if it had been done via referendum. ... There’s no additional burden with the taxpayers.”

Instead, Porth explains, the district opted for a lease/purchase plan that had to be done quickly to meet state law.

“Basically, the stars lined up” and it was a win-win situation that provided K-8 schools in both St. Matthews and Sandy Run, plus improvements at the high school, he said.

In return, Porth says, “the closing of John Ford and Guinyard is not a popular issue.” It tends, “to hit an emotional nerve, but those schools will live on,” through class reunions and memory.

As for opponents who ask why his son doesn’t attend the local public school, Porth says the teenager attends a public high school in Japan where he lives with his mother and stepfather.

A native of Calhoun County, Porth is a graduate of Clemson University. He is a recent graduate of Charleston School of Law.

Tommie J. GloverA guidance counselor in neighboring Richland County, Glover says he wants to expand the leadership he’s demonstrated on the school level to “be a leader in the community.”

As a lifelong resident of Cameron and as a teacher, Glover says he offers change and new ideas for the district.

“We’re stuck in the mud,” he said. “You can’t continue to do the same thing and get different results.”

As for the bond issue, Glover says the community should have been more involved. The elected school board should have served the district better.

“The community didn’t have a say-so. The people didn’t know anything about it,” he said. “There was no public input.”

In addition, Glover says the district should have taken, “care of old business before new business.”

“There are already two vacant schools -- St. John and Bethlehem. They’re building a new school to house Guinyard and John Ford. After completion, there will be two more vacant schools,” he said.

“We should have figured out what to do with the old schools before building new ones.”

While acknowledging the good job being done in the school district, Glover proposes a, “new level when it comes to teacher appreciation and teacher attrition. We need to keep those good teachers. Money should be spent on further training and (better) salaries. We have competing districts in the Midlands. The money we spend should be spent in the classroom.”

Campaigning to be a “representative voice,” for constituents, Glover stresses that he is not in favor of any tax increases for the community.

“I am willing to fight for our children, just as much as I am willing to fight for our country,” he said.

Glover, who was named “Teacher of the Year” at his school last year, did his student teaching at the old St. John Elementary School in Calhoun County. Also, his wife is this year’s “Teacher of the Year” in Kershaw County.

A native of Calhoun County, Glover has a bachelor’s degree in elementary education from Claflin University and a master’s degree in counselor education from South Carolina State University. He has served 12 years in the military reserves.

Melody Inabinet Pedings

Although making her first bid for political office, Pedings says she’s been actively involved in public education for more than 20 years, since her eldest child entered the system.

“I feel I need to run. Parents are not adequately represented on the board. Board members don’t have children (in the local public school system).” she said. “Since I had been involved at the public school level, I felt it was time to run.”

Pedings said she was “adamantly opposed” to the new school construction.

“We had one middle school large enough. I don’t feel a K-8 school is a good option, just simply because of the age span,” she said.

Another key difference she takes with Porth and the board majority, Pedings says, is her opposition to school vouchers.

“I do not support the school voucher issue that comes up again and again at the state and national level,” she said. “It’s disappointing our board would not vote for a proclamation against school vouchers.”

The 3-2 vote against the proclamation, she says, was “very disconcerting to me.”

“Although I was not for the building of the K-8 school, at this time I believe we ought to just move ahead,” she said. “Because the children are the ones who will suffer if we drag this on.”

“Very concerned,” about the future of public education, Pedings says she just hopes “someone who is truly interested in public education gets elected, someone who is truly interested.”

A native of Calhoun County, Pedings is a high school graduate who has taken technical college courses. She does volunteer work at the public library.

Scott Segars

Endorsed by Arant, Segars did not return repeated telephone messages.

T&D Government Writer Tucker Lyon can be reached at tlyon@timesanddemocrat.com or by calling 803-533-5545.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
5 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

goldstar wrote on Oct 28, 2008 7:40 PM:

" I hope and pray that the folks in Calhoun County do not allow board members who do not allow their children to attend school within their own school district to serve on the board. "

clipper wrote on Oct 26, 2008 12:02 AM:

" Porth is a good man. "

minimouse wrote on Oct 22, 2008 7:45 PM:

" Mr Glover,
How many children do you have? Where do they go to school?
How many children does Joyce Jones Parrish have?
Where do they go to school?
Your assertion that because a person does not have a child in public school in this county they are disqualified from serving on the school board is wrong.
There are 15,000 people living in Calhoun County.
The enrollment for this year wont exceed 1500.
This means that we should expect the school board to be comprised of persons with no school aged children. Persons with no children and persons with no children in public school to be running for board seats and to be actually serving on the board.
President Clinton was a huge advocate for public school. His child did not attend public school.
Porth has always opposed large expenditures of tax dollars. He supported the recent building projects because it was a once in a life time chance to do huge projects without a huge tax increase.
He is smart for voting to improve all of the county"s schools thru this plan.

If you had been on the board when this vote was made you would have voted against it I assume.
Why? Why? Why? "

cougar wrote on Oct 22, 2008 5:50 PM:

" I read this article this morning, I work in Lexington County, live in Calhoun (and very proud to be a Calhoun County citizen), riding home from work on I-26 this afternoon, I look up and see a billboard celebrating the exceptional progress our Calhoun County public schools have made recently. It is obvious someone is doing something right for our childrens'sake and considering the progress when comparing the present to the past, maybe we DO need to forget the past and move forward. It is not in our childrens' best interest to live in the past if we want our state and county to move forward. "

TGlover wrote on Oct 21, 2008 5:18 PM:

" Mmmmmm, well all of the issues have not been addressed. Yes, currently, Mr. Porth's son may be in Japan. Nevertheless, we must not forget the past. When his son was in Calhoun County, the only time he came to a public school,was for a visit. I am not concerned with his child attending a private school, but be honest enough to say that your child was not enrolled in a Calhoun County public school while you sat on the school board. Then again, we must also think back to a company that Mr.Porth worked for, or was owned by his father, that was contracted to do work for the school district in Sandy Run. Well, seems like a conflict of interest to me. Are we really interested in doing what is right for the childrens' sake, or are we interested in doing what is right for our pocket's sake. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News