* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Smith sues Red Cross

By DIONNE GLEATON, T&D Staff Writer  Thursday, November 27, 2008

9 comment(s) | Default | Large

The former executive director of the Greater Edisto Chapter of the American Red Cross is suing the charity.

After two decades in the position, Cindy Smith was dismissed as the executive director of the chapter on Oct. 16. On Wednesday, she sued the American National Red Cross and the American Red Cross of Central South Carolina and its chief executive officer, Scott Salemme.

Smith is seeking a $1 million judgement against the defendants collectively and another $2 million in punitive damages from Salemme as an individual.

In her complaint, Smith alleges the Red Cross terminated her improperly. It also accuses Salemme of "intentional infliction of emotional distress."

J. Lewis Cromer, Smith's attorney, said in a release that, "This fine lady has been treated most shabbily by an organization designed to protect and help people in times of need and not to throw good people under the bus for personal reasons."

"She has been strongly supported by her board of directors and continues to have their support and, more importantly, the support of the people of Orangeburg County for whom she has labored over two decades in the vineyards. We will do everything that we can to see that she is vindicated and receives the same measure of fairness that she has always shown to others in her dealings for the American Red Cross and the Greater Edisto Chapter," Cromer said.

The Red Cross completed a reorganization plan in July 2008, at which time Salemme retained his position as CEO of the Central South Carolina ARC Chapter and took charge of the Greater Edisto ARC Chapter, the lawsuit stated.

Smith's complaint says Salemme then, "began a ruthless campaign of criticism and obstruction" aimed at removing her.

It alleges that Salemme was instrumental in taking away Smith's accrued leave time with the Red Cross which she values at $65,000. It also claims Salemme revoked the chapter's severance policy, under which she was to receive six months worth of severance pay if her position was eliminated.

"Salemme lacked any basis for such termination nor any authority to terminate her absent the approval" of the local chapter's board of directors, the complaint states.

Salemme said Wednesday that while he was not aware of a lawsuit and couldn't specifically comment on it, he was disappointed that it was filed.

"I thought we could get through the whole process, that we could work through these types of situations. I'm disappointed that it's occurred. I'm at a loss for words. I'd like to look at the entire document before I can comment on that," he said.

Smith is also suing for defamation of character, with the suit claiming that Salemme accused her on several occasions of improper management as executive director "often in the presence of other board members and outside persons."

The lawsuit also alleges Salemme created a hostile work environment marked by "constant interference, threats and baseless remarks" all while Smith was "under extreme pressure and suffering from serious physical conditions."

The Greater Edisto Chapter of the ARC is headquartered in Orangeburg and serves Orangeburg, Barnwell and Allendale counties.

T&D Staff Writer Dionne Gleaton can be reached by e-mail at dgleaton@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-533-5534.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
9 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

SCMOM2008 wrote on Dec 1, 2008 1:23 PM:

" So if Mrs. Smith's employer is in the wrong then how do you suggest Mrs. Smith to get her problem resolved other than a lawsuit? It just so happens that her employer was the Red Cross unfortunately for her. If it was another type of employer would you suggest the same steps for her to take? I agree that taking money from the Red Cross Organization is not good at all but does anyone have any better method? I feel that she should get this resolved for her benefit too. "

orangeburger wrote on Dec 1, 2008 9:10 AM:

" To the Local Redcross: Don't ask me to give you a penny until you set your house in order and start behaving like adults. No matter what her greivance, suing Redcross is ridiculous. If the lady is awarded any "public donated money" in damages, I'd like to ask the citizens to ponder who will come to their rescue next time we have a local crisis. Stop behaving like imbeciles and get back to work.
Redcross is NOT Orangeburg City Council! We expect more accountability to the public from them. "

scherdsman wrote on Nov 29, 2008 9:27 AM:

" Confisus_sum -
I don't agree with you all the time, but this time you are absolutely correct!!! "

confisus_sum wrote on Nov 28, 2008 5:02 PM:

" How does suing an organization that helps others solve anything? Whether people like it or not, SC is an at-will state. They didn't have to give a reason. Curious how all these folks are crucifying the Red Cross official without knowing but one side of the story. I am sorry the lady's performance indicated that she be dismissed, but I think taking millions from people that the Red Cross would ultimately help is far worse than her termination. "

scherdsman wrote on Nov 28, 2008 4:31 PM:

" BHT - Get what is hers?? She was supposed to be helping people when they were hurting, down and out. Nothing was hers. If she wasn't getting paid enough then she should have addressed that before now. From your comments, she was having problems before Salemme became her supervisor. "

BHT wrote on Nov 28, 2008 2:34 PM:

" WHY SHOULD CINDY BE ASHAMED ON ANYTHING? THIS NEW GUY ON THE BLOCK DREW FIRST BLOOD---SHE HAS ALWAYS DONE A WONDERFUL JOB. SHE IS A VERY CARING, LOVING PERSON WHO HAS NEVER BEEN PAID ENOUGH FOR WHAT SHE DOES. SHE HAS SPENT HER OWN MONEY AND TIME NOT COMPENSATED AND NEVER ONCE COMPLAINED. IT'S NOT "CHANGE" MR. KNOW-IT-ALL WANTS, HE IS JEALOUS THAT SHE KNOWS MORE THAN HE'LL EVER LEARN ABOUT HOW TO TAKE CARE OF AND TREAT PEOPLE IN THEIR TIME OF NEED. GO GET 'UM, CINDY, I PRAY YOU WIN WHAT YOU ASK FOR AND MORE!!!!! IT'S TIME PEOPLE "TAKE BACK WHAT'S THEIRS." "

scherdsman wrote on Nov 28, 2008 1:34 PM:

" In any agency or business when their is a change in management you will have individuals that are dismissed. A lot of the time they have been in their position for a number of years. They typically have lost touch with the people that they serve, and actually believe that they can do no wrong and that their methods are the only way to pursue their endeavor. When a change in management occurs then the new leader tries to work with the individuals to bring them to their way of thinking and to get "on the same page." Mrs. Smith apparently was unwilling to change or was unable to change fast enough for them. Also, in the paper it states that she is suing for a severance package of six months; but in the same sentence it states that the severance package is there in case the position is eliminated. Being fired and having a position eliminated are two distinctly different means of leaving employment. Finally, Mrs. Smith, should be ashamed of suing the organization that she has worked for trying to raise money for people in dire need. On one hand she worked so "hard" all these years for those individuals and now she wants to take money from them, doesn't really seem right, does it? "

7734 wrote on Nov 27, 2008 4:58 PM:

" Cindy should get everything that she is sueing for. Salemme needs to get what he deserves, he should be dismissed from his position! "

duh... wrote on Nov 27, 2008 11:44 AM:

" Saw that one coming a mile away! Get 'em Cindy! "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News