* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Jobless worry while Sanford withholds OK for fed money

By LEE TANT, T&D Staff Writer  Tuesday, December 30, 2008

11 comment(s) | Default | Large

David Harvin spent Monday morning bent over in a chair, waiting to hear his name called. He was one of many hoping to receive their unemployment benefits at the S.C. Employment Security Commission's Orangeburg office.

Harvin wondered if it was a waste of time because Gov. Mark Sanford hasn't yet applied for the $146 million federal loan needed to keep the state's unemployment fund solvent.

Without the loan, the state will be forced to stop paying out unemployment benefits on Thursday.

"What's the point of coming if they don't have the money?" Harvin said.

He was recently laid off from Husqvarna Outdoor Products Inc. Times have been tough for Harvin since then.

Harvin says he hasn't received any unemployment benefits thus far and the bills are piling up. But he said the uncertainty of the situation makes matters much worse.

"I don't know what's going to happen from today 'til tomorrow," he said.

The heart of the problem lies in Sanford's displeasure with the management of the S.C. Employment Security Commission. He won't sign off on the loan until the SCESC submits to an independent audit and pledges to share its data with the S.C. Department of Commerce.

The two sides had not reached an agreement Monday afternoon, according to Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer.

Sawyer added Sanford is standing up for the unemployed by demanding the SCESC operate more efficiently.

He said the shortfall in the state's unemployment fund was due to lawmakers not addressing the issue.

State Rep. Bakari Sellers, D-Denmark, represents an area plagued with unemployment and poverty. He said it is an absurd time to play politics with people's lives.

"It's an abuse of his leadership," Sellers said of Sanford.

He said some people seeking unemployment benefits are hard-working state or corporate employees who have been laid off due to the economy.

State Rep. Jerry Govan, D-Orangeburg, said the governor's position, "absolutely does not make any kind of sense."

Govan said the state's financial woes make Sanford's position curious.

"When people don't have jobs, they can't pay mortgages, car notes or loans. And they are definitely not paying taxes," he said.

In November, Orangeburg County's unemployment rate was the ninth highest in the state at 12.6 percent.

Bowman resident Beverly Jones said suspending unemployment benefits would be a disaster. Jones is currently out of work and her husband, LeRoy, collects disability.

The situation has Jones feeling like her back is against the wall.

"If I lose unemployment, I'm going to be honest, I don't know what I'm going to do," she said.

Robert Moore of Santee firmly believes criminal activity will balloon if the state ceases unemployment assistance.

He questioned how Sanford can sleep at night while others are on unstable financial ground.

"One man can destroy everything. ... I'm just hoping things will change in the next couple of days," he said.

Sawyer said nobody wants the benefits to be suspended. He declined to say what would happen if an agreement is not reached by Wednesday.

"We will cross that bridge when we come to it," he said.

T&D Staff Writer Lee Tant can be reached by e-mail at ltant@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-534-1060.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
11 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

soundjudgement65 wrote on Jan 6, 2009 10:46 AM:

" This comment is for the "Norwegian"......You always have something negative to say about everything. You never see the good in any problem or a clear path in any storm. Sometime bad things happen to good people....Alot of people who are on unemployment were hardworking people with jobs until either they were layed off, or the company left. You don't know when you will be put in that predicatment. I was on unemployment for 6 months because my job stated they would never leave and they turned right around and dumped our center for another center across seas. It took me 9 and a half months to get a job......so don't judge b/c you don't know peoples situations. I watched my father who is a hard working man go from job to job because every job he had either kept leaving and going across seas or they would lay him off and he would have to go on unemployment to support the family until the next job came. Sometimes it took my father almost 6 months to a year to to find the next job. What Sanford needs to do is bring jobs to this state which is something he never did, and is not doing. I bet if Norwegian lost his/her job Norwegian would be the first one down at the unemployment office filling out paper work to collect their benefits. And if Norwegian was one of the unemployed who could not get his/her check during the time Sandford refuse to sign the papers he/she would have been infuriated..Norwegian you never know when you will be down because things happen. Bad times come and you can't say how you will handle it, and what you will do because every situation is different. "

Jasmine28 wrote on Jan 4, 2009 9:46 PM:

" norwegian

Your information I have never applied at the SCESC office I have no reason too, u dont want to admit that I am right about our government is in control and in power over us. Listen to alex jones @ www.prisonplanet.com and listen to his live radio show, he is a radio talk host talks about what are government is doing to us. "

norwegian wrote on Jan 1, 2009 10:57 AM:

" jasmine28 I believe your post speaks volumes on why you might be at the SCESC office. "

norwegian wrote on Dec 31, 2008 2:22 PM:

" The first 3 posts on this story show the problem in its entirety. You have people that blame the gov't for their problems. They need to blame themselves and stand up and do something for themselves. The gov't wasn't designed to tote moochers 24/7. The SCESC is out of cash because they threw it at anyone and everyone and now they are crying because The Man wants to know how they spent it. Same scenario if your mom asked you what you did with your allowance, are you gonna whine about her wanting to know where it went or do you simply comply with reason and be accountable and honest. If you do not comply she might cut your allowance off and that is what happened here. Comprende???? "

norwegian wrote on Dec 31, 2008 2:13 PM:

" Go Gov Sanford. People we need accountability and the SCESC isn't willing to have their books looked at. This means something isn't on the level there. All you who just want a free handout need to wake up. If we can't account for where the money is then stop the program. Our local reps Govan and Sellers are the ones doing the political posturing here. There kis no such thing as a free ride these days... "

openeyes1134 wrote on Dec 30, 2008 8:13 PM:

" It is very easy to agree that Gov. Sanford is right, when you are not a single mother who has lost her job, who still has a house payment, and children to feed. People like us rely on unemployment benefits to help do these things! "

confisus_sum wrote on Dec 30, 2008 7:49 PM:

" It is not the Governor refusing this money. He has said that this money would be asked for, IF the agency assigned to distribute it was held accountable. What is wrong with accountability? Every state agency should have to be externally audited annually. Why are people attacking Sanford for trying to protect their money? Sanford has consistently supported any proposal that would reduce spending, and lead to a more efficient and productive state government. To have Govan criticize a desire for accountability shows his own lack of governance. In regards to Sellers, his youthful ingorance should be growing tiresome to the people he represents. He appears to be incapable of forming his own opinions, rather relying on party rhetoric. Bottomline is that Sanford is right, and those that don't see that are blinded by liberal politics. Time for democrats to think about the future, and not just pandering to the fears of their constituency. "

elloree67 wrote on Dec 30, 2008 1:33 PM:

" So we let a department operate without someone knowing what they are doing with the money. You blame Gov. Sanford, what about the SCESC are they afraid to have an audit. We have to many people spending tax payers dollars without having to account for their actions.
Gov. Sanford I believe you are right, keep up the good work. "

Jasmine28 wrote on Dec 30, 2008 1:26 PM:

" Wake up people are government is corputed all they care about is power and money for themselves they dont care about us they care about themselves they want to see us suffer. The politics are the ones that started this staged war and 9/11 was staged by our own government the chem trails in the sky are chemicals that are in the air that we breath that is being sprayed in the air for us by the government if u dont believe that are government is controlling us then go to www.prisonplanet.com & www.infowars.com "

gone fishing wrote on Dec 30, 2008 10:53 AM:

" How about everyone who did not receive a check just go camp out at the Governor's mansion since is belongs to the state. I'm sure he has food, heat and a nice place to lay his head. Or better yet impeach the moon struck guy. For some reason he thinks he is god and the unemployed are slaves!! "

captivated wrote on Dec 30, 2008 7:26 AM:

" I agree with Rep. Govan. This posturing by Sanford does not make any sense. Looks like he wants to add wholesale bankruptcy to the list of things S.C. is becoming well known for. Not only will we be last in education, first in illiteracy, near the bottom in salaries and job opportunities, near the top in crime and drug usage and fast becoming the laughing stock state, but now we will also be the hungriest state if Sanford doesn't sign for this loan. I believe anyone who misses an unemployment check this week should go to Sanford's house for dinner this weekend. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News