* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• STAR CLOVERS: Treking into the 4-H future
• 2010 HOOPS CHALLENGE: Play for the glory
• VIDEO: Jogger killed by plane
• STUDY: Too many invasive tests being given
• PATH TO THE DRAFT: Diary of Ricky Sapp

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Animal Control officer charged with assault; claims ricochet

By RICHARD WALKER, T&D Staff Writer  Thursday, January 08, 2009

17 comment(s) | Default | Large

An Orangeburg County Animal Control officer has been charged with assault in connection with a shooting incident last month.

On Wednesday, 49-year-old Reginald E. Wright turned himself in before a bond hearing, where he was charged with assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature.

"Do you understand the charge?" Orangeburg County Chief Magistrate Sam Daily asked.

In response, Wright appeared to shake his head in uncertainty.

A warrant against Wright alleges the Nance Street man was negligent during a Dec. 18 incident in which a woman was struck by a bullet. The warrant further alleges he was attempting to apprehend a dog when he fired a .22 caliber rifle in the vicinity of several individuals outside their home off Rivelon Road.

During Monday's hearing, Orangeburg County Sheriff's Office Lt. Ronda Bamberg said law enforcement officials were not opposed to a personal recognizance bond for Wright.

"He had fired several shots at the dog, on his final shot, it struck and hit the victim in the thigh area," Bamberg said. "He's cooperated with law enforcement."

Daily granted the personal recognizance bond, setting the amount at $10,000. Wright was released a short while later.

Michelle Champy, the Lyons Road woman who said she was shot during the incident, didn't oppose Wright's bond, stating she felt it was fair.

Champy, however, declined further comment on the advice of an attorney. She is considering suing over the incident.

Prior to Daily's decision, Wright stood quietly and appeared dazed.

"It had to have been a ricochet," Wright said softly.

"You're saying you didn't deliberately shoot Miss Champy?" Daily said.

"What I am saying is I shot the animal on the third shot and bullet ricocheted."

"And you're law enforcement with animal control?"

"Yes, sir."

"Any questions? You look kind of puzzled."

Wright shook his head again.

After the incident, Champy said she was in her yard with several small children when she was struck. She was treated for the injury and released later that day from the hospital.

In court Wednesday, Champy was accompanied by her sister, Jamie Ferguson, who said she was at work when she got a call saying Champy had been shot.

"The only part that gets me is that he still has not said, 'I'm sorry,'" Ferguson said after the hearing.

Wright and Orangeburg County Animal Control Director Ben Boensch arrived at the courthouse about 10 minutes prior to the hearing. After the hearing, Boensch left without comment.

Wright's status as a county employee and that of a co-worker remains unclear. After the incident, county officials said the pair had been placed on paid administrative leave while the case was being investigated.

On Wednesday, calls to Orangeburg County Administrator Bill Clark and County Public Works Deputy Administrator Earl Whalen seeking comment went unreturned.

Meantime, Sheriff Larry Williams said the investigation showed Wright did not intend to shoot Champy. But there was still a battery involved, he said.

"This weapon was discharged to apprehend this animal," Williams said. "But there is no evidence at this time that establishes that he had an intent to do any harm to this lady."

Williams said without any intent, the assault charge of a high and aggravated nature is warranted. According to state law, the charge can carry up to 10 years in prison, if convicted.

"Unfortunately, his actions did cause an injury," the sheriff said.

T&D Staff Writer Richard Walker can be reached by e-mail at rwalker@timesanddemocrat.com or by telephone at 803-533-5516.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
17 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

Jasmine28 wrote on Jan 20, 2009 2:30 PM:

" oburglady:

I accept your aplogy I just dont want this falling back on me I am not saying you are, I am just saying I dont want anyone blaming me or hating me when I called animal control my friends and family told me I did the right thing and they would have done the same thing and not just you and me that called but there were others on Lyons Road that called animal control as well. "

oburglady wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:14 PM:

" Apology accepted, and you didnt cause any problems for us. You just can't believe everything you hear. I am an easy person to get along with. "

Jasmine28 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 12:22 AM:

" Maybe when are lease is up we might consider moving again from Lyons Road back where my mom lives where I grew up & went to school in Conway, maybe instead of moving from the other area in Orangeburg where we were before moving to Lyons Road we should have just moved to Conway that way this situation about calling the animal control and the cops would have never happen and that woman would had never gotten shot but this happens all the time in other places no matter where you live but all I have to say is I never told our landlord anything I just asked if he heard about it and I told him that the dogs were bothering the cats and being aggressive towards my husband and my kids and all I wanted was to move in a area where my son had kids his age that he can play with instead of his 9 month old brother but I guess that wont happen since we blew it life must go on I am not worried about it we live our lives like we always do just to ourselves. Our two cats will be going to Conway my mom's house cause I dont want them to go in other people's yards which the only place they go to is the neighbor's next door on both sides of us and they come back in our yard and hide but if my cats tear up any dogs that come in our yard dont have anyone on Lyons Road come crying to us cause our cats have a right to defend themselves. "

Jasmine28 wrote on Jan 13, 2009 11:45 PM:

" oburglady:

Sorry if my family and I started anything we just moved here and we dont start problems we dont want any problems we keep to ourselves. My husband and I have two young kids 5yrs old & 9 months old and we didnt know who them dogs belong to but they were bothering our cats and they were aggressive to my kids when them two dogs were together my husband and I saw the dogs in your yard at times so we figure they were your dogs and besides the reason the cop was called is that we were told them dogs were yours and I didnt want them dogs to get hurt and I didnt call the animal control to come get the puppies or for the one officer to go in yards shooting I called for them to come get the brown & black dog only. My husband came home from picking up our 5 yr old from school and he told our 5 yr to get in the house the dogs were aggressive they acted like they were going to bite him and our son. I told the cop that I didnt know for sure if the dogs belong to the people across the street but I told him if they do to keep them tied down if they dont then someone dropped them off down this road I love animals and I dont want to see them get hurt that is what I told the cop. I am sorry that we caused problems for you and your family we were happy to get this house for rent we didnt and dont mean no harm to anyone and we were looking forward to meeting new people in this area and for our 5 yr old son to make new friends my husband and I have 2 boys and I just had hernia surgery Dec 3 and gallbladder surgery Sept 9th 2008 and I told the cop that I dont need dogs jumping on me or biting me which they never did I am still recovering from that and I will be glad to go back to work in Feb I hope sorry for the inconvience that we caused you and your family and the people up the road I really didnt want to call the animal control officer or the police dept, we had a dog we had to put him up at the animal shelter before we could move here it broke our heart he was a healthy well kept dog part lab part rot he was only 3 yrs old. Sorry we got our facts wrong we wont talk or listen to anyone around here anymore sorry we started on the wrong foot you or anyone else on this road would have done the same thing about our cats if they were in there yard. "

elcid87 wrote on Jan 13, 2009 12:05 PM:

" Maybe we should get the public service and county sheriff to use similar tactics.
a
A 22 shell is much cheaper than the alternative. I would suggest a higher caliber.
If someone shows up at my home shooting for any reason and endangering my family, I would regretfully be compelled to shoot back for fear of our safety. This could have been much worse. Some folks are armed and ready to protect their families. If we allow animal control to venture throug neighborhoods firing at animals we are inviting disaster.
defining policy and strictly enforcing it is necessary. When I pull the trigger, I know my target, know what is down range, and know what is possible from my actions. This gentleman needs more training before having a gun and more training before participating in animal control. I pity the man for his feeling in his conscious. He knows his adrenalin out ran his mind. "

oburglady wrote on Jan 13, 2009 5:52 AM:

" Okay I am the lady "across the street", and I never wanted to keep any of the dogs, they were strays, and why would anyone be mad at you, Jasmine28, for calling animal control when I did the same thing, did you not see the trap in my yard??? and just for the record my family causes no problems for anyone, we don't associate with anyone from the neighborhood. Before you go around bashing people get your facts staight. You don't know me to say we are blaming you,which I don't. Accidents happen everday, which is what this was. There use to be a day if you had a problem with a neighbor you would talk to them, now people pick up the phone and call the sheriff, it's really sad. "

bravo14sc wrote on Jan 11, 2009 9:41 AM:

" I'm sure the officer did not intend to shoot the lady. I am sorry that she was shot. I am sure the officer has had great suffering and guilt for accidentally shooting the lady. His suffering is increased by people calling him moron etc here on line. I am sure that the victim will be well compensated for this in a civil lawsuit. I do not think that the officer should have been charged with assault because I do not think he intentionally assulted the victim. It was an accident that happens all the time without charge. Unfortunate, yes but magnified because he was an animal control officer. As for shooting the dogs with a .22. This has been a practice of animal control for years. Hopefully they will change their policies. If this practice was ordered by animal control then they are at fault for accidents because they allowed it. "

Reddawg wrote on Jan 10, 2009 9:44 AM:

" This man was only doing his job. Sorry the lady accidentaly got hit. This is a situation where the law should stand and support this officer and not make him a criminal. seem like
Jasmine28 have the facts. This Officer was trying to protect people and their property. Sorry low live let their animals run wild. "

Jasmine28 wrote on Jan 9, 2009 10:37 PM:

" rmerri4354
For your information to your comment I am not a moron I live on Lyons Road and I didnt want them dogs coming in my yard bothering my cats and them dogs when they were together they were aggressive towards my family and I when we were outside I was told by my landlord that that lady that got shot that this would have not had happen if I or others on lyons road would have called the animal control officer and the officer should have not had a gun I agree the dog the dogs seem abused and scared and hungry the female brown dog had puppies and the lady across the street from me had the puppies in her yard and wanted to keep the brown dog cause of the puppies she should have tied that brown dog if she was going to keep that dog 2nd my landlord saw the officer standing behind his truck across the street and from me he told us that there was no way that he could have shot that lady he had to shoot trough the two house up the road to get to shoot that lady in the thigh and also our neighbors that had the brown dog and puppies are blaming my family and I for calling the animal control the police dept they both told me that its not a law to have ur dog on a leash or tied down them people are the morons so what do u think about that? I dont care if the people across from me and our landlord are mad at me for calling but I had a right and the other neighbors had rights to call to they told me that I did the right thing and so did my other neighbors. I am so glad that I am not from Orangeburg I was born and raised in Charleston. So to your answer to your inmature comment my landlord is saying that this story doesnt add up. "

purecnty wrote on Jan 9, 2009 9:03 AM:

" In answer to Jasmine28 a ricochet means that a bullet was deflected from the path at it was intended for.

I have had a bullet from a 22cal whise over my head during target partice after hitting some rocks burried in the ground. 22's are known to tumble whenb they slow down a little
When a thing is hit with a 22 the entrace wound and the bullet path are usually not in a straight path but can zigzag around the insides.
But the real issue is why shoot the dog to catch him. Was he really justified in shooting? "

rmerri4354 wrote on Jan 8, 2009 9:20 PM:

" Jasmine28 is a total moron... This is typical of Orangeburg. That officer should be thrown in jail for a long time. What if he had killed your child, or someone's child, or maybe even the lady he shot? The officer is also a total moron. Had someone's life been in jeopardy, maybe drawing a weapon at close range would be acceptable? But a 22 caliber rifle??? I can say this, if you pay officers barely enough money to live in a trailer what kind of officer do you think you will get??? Think about it... "

Joe Taxpayer wrote on Jan 8, 2009 4:21 PM:

" How exactly does a person apprehend a dog by shooting it with a .22 caliber rifle. This would not apprehend the animal, it would kill the animal. Now by that reasoning, if you work for animal control, one can dicharge a firearm in a residental neighborhood. Why is this practice acceptable? Depending on the grain of ammunition the projectile would travel between 1000 and 1200 feet per second. This OFFICER fired three rounds with no regard for human life. It truly is a disgusting thought that this man is paid to protect and serve. It is even more disgusting that his only defense is that "It had to be a ricochet" so again by that reasoning it was the ricochets fault and not the person that fired the weapon. Criminals make bad decisions and pay for them when caught. This officer made a bad decision and should be made to pay for it. "

purecnty wrote on Jan 8, 2009 2:48 PM:

" In answer to Jasmine28 a ricochet means that a bullet was deflected from the path at it was intended for.

I have had a bullet from a 22cal whise over my head during target partice after hitting some rocks burried in the ground. 22's are known to tumble whenb they slow down a little
When a thing is hit with a 22 the entrace wound and the bullet path are usually not in a straight path but can zigzag around the insides.
But the real issue is why shoot the dog to catch him. Was he really justified in shooting? "

alist wrote on Jan 8, 2009 10:14 AM:

" Since when did anyone with Animal Control start using a rifle to apprehend a dog? It seems as though someone should be doing some further investigations. "

purecnty wrote on Jan 8, 2009 9:41 AM:

" Being a hunter for many years, did a lot of target practicing and having severed in the Army, I have these comments. I not longer hunt because of the respect I have for deer. I do not condemn those who do.
1. It seems that Mr. Wright was tired of having to go back to the same area after the same dog. Just because the dog outsmarted you every time and got away, do not give you the right just to start firing at the poor animal. There are always other ways of handing, getting help. Setting traps and even food for bait.
2. Firing in residential neighborhoods are not legal in many states. I am not sure of the law in SC, but in PA you had to be more than 300 yards from a family structure to hunt. Shooting in the area of houses should only be done in life or death situations, then only by people who have had hours of training for such situations.
3. If you have to shot at the poor dog, use the correct ammunition. a 22 is the worst caliber to use, it has a range of 1 1/2 miles, deflects easily. A heavier bullet would been less likely to be deflected. They also make glaser bullets which are Frangible bullets, they break up when sticking a hard object. In this case a shotgun would have been a better choice with soft lead pellets. Remember a good hunting rule, if your in doubt about the path the bullet could take don't shoot.
4. Is there a protocol in place with animal control to handle this situation? Who makes the call, the control officer or the commander? When can use of deadly force be used.
5. I wonder if any hunting laws were also broken during this incident. I am sure there is no season for dog. But firing in the safety zones of houses is against the law.
6. Don't they make a tranquilizer dart that could have been used? I am sure some were in Orangeburg County one could be borrowed. If not it would be a cheap investment apposed to a law suit.
Hind site is always 20/20 but I think that there should have been rules in place to prevent this, if there ways why aren’t they being followed?
This twice animal treatment in Orangeburg County by public agencies in recent times. Do we need an oversight committee to watch these agencies? "

Jasmine28 wrote on Jan 8, 2009 8:44 AM:

" I live on Lyons Road and I am not the only one that called animal control that day there were others that called animal control, one thing that seems strange is I was told that the control officer was behind the white truck across the road from where I live and there was no way he could have shot that lady in the leg while being in her yard the officer would had to shoot through the two houses to get to her yard first of all her story doesnt add all up, second my family and I are being blamed by the people that live across the street there saying that to my landlord that them two dogs were not there dogs the lady wanted to keep the brown dog cause of the puppies well if your going to keep a dog for any reason you should have the dog tied down on a leash or behind a fence by law in SC its the against the law to have your pet loose when you have a pet you have to have control over that pet to keep that pet in your yard at all times its the law you have to have your pet on a leash. My neighbor, and other neighbors besides me called animal control they told me they have called not only me but others were calling every day for a month so I got tired of them making excuses not coming to get these dogs so I called Orangeburg Sherriff dept and one of the cops came to my house and I told him to tell the neighbors to keep them dogs tied down dont have them coming over here my house bothering my cats and the dogs were being aggressive towards my family and I.

My neighbor next to me told me them people across from my family and I and up the road where the lady claims she was shot they cause problems for people. "

captivated wrote on Jan 8, 2009 7:27 AM:

" So far noone has said whether the use of live ammo to apprehend strays is standard operating procedure for ACOs. This is getting stranger by the minute. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.





More News