* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• CLAFLIN v. CRIME: Lab puts science in hands of police
• CHARLESTON PORT: Lifeblood of local industries
• SCOUTING CENTENNIAL: Turning boys into men
• PHOTO GALLERY: Page Turner 2010
• VIDEO: Peanut butter for charity

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Rail proposal puts Orangeburg on the hot seat

 Sunday, May 17, 2009

1 comment(s) | Default | Large

ISSUE: Rail proposal for North Charleston

OUR VIEW: Proposal puts Orangeburg County in middle of larger dispute

Orangeburg may not have wanted to become a whipping boy in a much larger fuss over rail service at the new S.C. Ports Authority terminal at the former Navy based in North Charleston, but the county finds itself there.

This past week, Orangeburg County made news with a request of the federal government for $278 million in federal funds to help implement a controversial rail plan that calls for constructing an intermodal facility in North Charleston and running trains through the base’s north end.

Included in the proposal to U.S. House Majority Whip James Clyburn is a request for a separate facility on the base’s southern end, rail overpasses in North Charleston and a rail line running to Orangeburg County.

The proposal is consistent in the short term with Orangeburg County’s push to accommodate Jafza South Carolina’s plan for a logistics, manufacturing and distribution hub in Santee that is expected to yield a long-term investment of $600-700 million and up to 10,000 jobs.

It is equally consistent with a proposal laid out in February by Orangeburg County. Local officials used a Washington trip to promote a $700 million plan to create a “global logistics corridor” extending from the Port of Charleston to Columbia. The plan includes creation of the new freight rail shuttle service between Charleston and Orangeburg. Containers would flow in all directions from the planned 61-acre intermodal yard.

But all is not well.

One can imagine if it were the city of North Charleston making such a proposal for Orangeburg County that there might be some friction if a part of the plan didn’t sit well with local concerns.

That is exactly what has happened with the recent request to Clyburn.

Orangeburg County has entered the fray over use of the former Navy base, with North Charleston continuing to cite a memorandum of understanding with the state of South Carolina over limiting use of the base’s north end.

North Charleston Mayor Keith Summey continues to make the case that railroad infrastructure on the northern end amid growing communities is not welcome. And he is angry that Orangeburg County made a formal request for such without notifying him.

He favors an alternative plan that he says can serve both Norfolk Southern and CSX, although other officials contend that is impossible without use of the northern end.

Summey wants to see a focus on the alternative, and he is attacking Orangeburg County amid looking to make that happen. In a letter to Gregg Robinson of the Orangeburg County Development Commission, Summey said, “I am requesting a copy of the proposal from you so we may study your plans for my community.” He went on to say he has doubts about “Orangeburg County’s willingness to openly communicate with a fellow governmental entity.”

Now not everyone associated with the base project is in agreement with Summey over use of the northern end.

Sen. Larry Grooms, R-Berkeley, for example, has said the formal of understanding between the state and the city of North Charleston was a “flaw in strategic vision.”

For his part, Robinson is pushing a plan that is critical to Jafza and critical to Orangeburg County’s development as a logistics centerpiece. Being aggressive can make things happen. In this case, however, we are left to hope that our county’s ambitions have not stepped on toes to a point of derailing a key ingredient in the plan.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
1 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

LST wrote on May 17, 2009 10:30 AM:

" I had to track down an Orangeburg County engineer on my own when comments in news stories suggested that the County might be thinking of putting a construction access road for JAFZA through my property south of the project. When I got through, the engineer verified that my land was on a preferred route. Most of the other land owners in the area who might be affected have still had no contact, but I've been told that the County will be in touch after they've made their decisions. Unfortunately, someone there doesn't understand that it is much better to talk with everyone concerned before you make decisions that affect them, not after. As far as I can tell, only the town of Santee has been consulted in early stages, and they represent only a small fraction of those potentially affected by the project. North Charleston has a long complex history that leaves no easy answers, but whether there or and in the immediate vicinity of the project, they would get more good will and cooperation by communicating early and openly. It will be interesting to see if the current problem represents a fatal flaw in plans for JAFZA. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News