* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• STAR CLOVERS: Treking into the 4-H future
• 2010 HOOPS CHALLENGE: Play for the glory
• VIDEO: Jogger killed by plane
• STUDY: Too many invasive tests being given
• PATH TO THE DRAFT: Diary of Ricky Sapp

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Woman awarded $220,000 wants more from county

By PHIL SARATA, T&D Staff Writer  Tuesday, June 23, 2009

4 comment(s) | Default | Large

A Neeses woman who won $220,000 in her lawsuit against Orangeburg County is now seeking a new trial.

Janice Hiott claims last month’s verdict was so inadequate that it requires a new trial. Orangeburg County is also requesting a new trial.

Circuit Court Judge James C. Williams Jr., who presided over the original trial, hasn’t scheduled a date to hear the motions for a new trial.

Hiott says she complained to the county for a decade that runoff from Starwood Drive, a county-maintained dirt road, was damaging her ponds, according to court documents.

Hiott said she contacted a pond repair service about fixing a breached portion of a dam after she bought the property in 1995. The repairman told Hiott the repair wouldn’t last due to runoff from the county’s road.

The county attempted to remove sediment from one of Hiott’s ponds in 1999 but stopped because of the excess moisture. Hiott contends county employees told her they would return when the area dried out, but they didn’t.

In December 2004, Orangeburg County workers constructed a sediment trap in the area. Hiott later tried to convince the county to work on three of her ponds, but it refused. Instead, the county said it would only work on one of the ponds because it wasn’t sure how much of her problem stemmed from Starwood Drive.

The county claims Hiott waited too long to sue. It also claims she asked to be compensated for damages dating back to 2005, but how much damage has been done since that time can’t be determined.

The county also said it never breached a contract with Hiott to make repairs because they never agreed on what the county should repair.

On May 29, an Orangeburg County jury awarded Hiott $10,000 in actual damages on her breach of contract complaint against the county. It also awarded her $210,000 on her separate claim that the county was negligent for causing damage to her property.

T&D Staff Writer Phil Sarata can be reached by e-mail at psarata@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-533-5540.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
4 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

trojanhero wrote on Jun 25, 2009 8:41 PM:

" newspaper, truth, beginning,speak, truth-please use spell check!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

boowee1 wrote on Jun 24, 2009 9:26 PM:

" The news paper never prints the true. If you all had been there from the beging. You would know. What you are reading is not all true. Before, people speek they should know the true............. "

trojanhero wrote on Jun 24, 2009 7:12 PM:

" Have to agree with you Orangeburger-she is greedy-take what you got and be pleased-Have a Blessed Day! "

orangeburger wrote on Jun 24, 2009 4:12 PM:

" This old gal (and her attorney) are greedy,if not insane! The judge should order no payment but order city to purchase her land for fair price or exchange with comparable property. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.
Janice Hiott says runoff from a county-maintained road damaged her pond and an Orangeburg County jury agreed. But she says the $220,000 she was awarded isn’t enough. (LARRY HARDY/T&D)




More News