* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• CLAFLIN v. CRIME: Lab puts science in hands of police
• CHARLESTON PORT: Lifeblood of local industries
• SCOUTING CENTENNIAL: Turning boys into men
• PHOTO GALLERY: Page Turner 2010
• VIDEO: Peanut butter for charity

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Dispute over sign rules moves to federal court

By PHIL SARATA, T&D Staff Writer  Sunday, July 05, 2009

3 comment(s) | Default | Large

Controversy over enforcement of an Orangeburg city sign ordinance has moved to federal district court.

On June 24, Mabel All sued the City of Orangeburg, saying it violated her constitutional free speech rights when it removed a political sign from her yard. She is seeking an injunction to stop the city from doing it again.

City Administrator John Yow said, "I can only confirm that we have received this lawsuit and we are in the process of reviewing it with our attorney and the affected parties." The city has not yet responded to All's complaint.

According to the lawsuit, All placed a sign supporting Bill Connor for lieutenant governor between her fence and trees next to Custer Court in April. The city sent All a letter saying political signs can only be displayed 30 days prior to an election. It also said signs can not be displayed on the road right-of-way and no closer than five feet from the right-of-way.

Code enforcement officials removed the sign in early May.

Connor is an attorney with Hamilton and Associates, which filed the lawsuit on All's behalf, but says he did not bring his firm into the lawsuit.

"I tried to talk with city council and the mayor because I felt this could have been done without a lawsuit," Connor said. "I feel the ordinance was unconstitutional in the first place, but Col. Henry Hamilton, who has also fought for this country and has the same feelings as me on issues like this, felt it was wrong.

"I don't want to make political hay out of this. But government cannot limit political speech in this manner."

After briefing city council in executive session on May 19, City Attorney James Walsh said he had discussed the sign issue with the consultant who helped develop the ordinance language.

Walsh added that he agreed the ordinance's intent was not to, "prohibit political signs totally in residential areas."

When asked Tuesday if the ordinance might now warrant revisiting by council, Walsh declined to comment on the matter, saying it was a part of the lawsuit.

n

T&D Staff Writer Phil Sarata can be reached by e-mail at psarata@timesanddemocrat.com or by telephone at 803-533-5540. Discuss this and other stories online at TheTandD.com.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
3 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

rump wrote on Jul 5, 2009 7:34 PM:

" There were Obama and McCain signs for over a year!! Thoses are FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

larry dunster wrote on Jul 5, 2009 1:05 PM:

" 30 days for political signs is 29 days too long.
We need to protect our residents from the litter of unneeded and unwanted signs.

Larry "

cherokee wrote on Jul 5, 2009 10:41 AM:

" Do you understand that if he wins, then there is a possibility that the city will be over run with signs advertising anything and everything. We NEED a sign ordinance? "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News