* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• CLAFLIN v. CRIME: Lab puts science in hands of police
• CHARLESTON PORT: Lifeblood of local industries
• SCOUTING CENTENNIAL: Turning boys into men
• PHOTO GALLERY: Page Turner 2010
• VIDEO: Peanut butter for charity

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Former officers accused of mistreating animals

By LEE HENDREN, T&D Staff Writer  Sunday, July 19, 2009

13 comment(s) | Default | Large

Two former Orangeburg County Animal Control officers have been charged with multiple counts of ill treatment of animals while performing their official duties.

The warrants stem from 2006, when the State Law Enforcement Division alleges they did not use the proper procedures to euthanize animals.

Warrants allege the men "did knowingly and/or intentionally ill-treat and inflict unnecessary pain or suffering upon" various animals at the county animal shelter in September or October 2006, "by employing the 'heart-stick' method of euthanasia without first providing sedation" as required by state law.

Under the heart-stick method, the euthanasia drug is injected directly into the animal's heart.

The warrants say other employees and volunteers at the county animal shelter witnessed the incidents.

The agency claims to have seen graphic video proof that the two "failed to follow procedures for performing euthanasia," including failing to weigh the animals to determine the proper amount of euthanasia solution that should have been administered.

Scotty James Thomas, 38, of 119 Wileswood Drive, Orangeburg, faces six misdemeanor counts. Johnny Kenoid Spells, 50, of 137 Nimmons Road, Orangeburg, faces four misdemeanor counts.

Both appeared before Orangeburg County Magistrate Derrick Dash on June 16 for bond hearings, court records show. Spells was released on a $4,000 personal recognizance bond. Thomas was released on a $6,000 personal recognizance bond, with the stipulation that he must have the court's permission to leave the state.

Trials for both were set for June 30, but their attorneys requested that be delayed. They are represented by Russell A. Blanchard IV and Charles Williams.

Blanchard said Friday afternoon that he didn't have any comment on the issue at that time.

According to previously published reports, investigators with the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control viewed the video on April 26, 2007 and launched an investigation of the Orangeburg County Animal Control program.

DHEC informed the animal control program employees of its investigation on May 24, 2007. Soon afterward, Orangeburg County Administrator Bill Clark placed four animal control officers and their manager at the time on paid administrative leave. On June 1, 2007, all five of the suspended employees were fired.

"The reason for your termination is your failure to properly administer euthanasia protocols in the manner prescribed under the laws of the state of South Carolina," Clark wrote in the termination letters.

T&D Staff Writer Lee Hendren can be reached by e-mail at lhendren@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-533-5523. Discuss this and other stories online at TheTandD.com.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
13 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

nouveaudebut wrote on Jul 25, 2009 4:37 AM:

" To: SICKOFCRYING, if you wish to change the tax allocation in this county, then run for council. "

nouveaudebut wrote on Jul 25, 2009 4:35 AM:

" And SICKOFCRYING, it is far from over with. The damage to families involved will be far reaching and the real truth may not be known. "

nouveaudebut wrote on Jul 25, 2009 4:33 AM:

" To: SICKOFCRYING, Obviously not many of YOUR tax dollars are spent on this facility. For the size of this county it is too small. "

nouveaudebut wrote on Jul 25, 2009 4:30 AM:

" To: SICKOFCRYING
I DO know of what I speak. The officers were complacent in their duties. No comparison of canines to humans! "

SICKOFCRYING wrote on Jul 24, 2009 12:53 AM:

" nouveaudebut PLEASE STOP COMPARING A STUPID DOG TO THAT OF A PERSON. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. SO STOP MAKING JUDGEMENT IT'S OVER WITH. "

SICKOFCRYING wrote on Jul 24, 2009 12:51 AM:

" melmel please wake up these guys got caught up in political bull. i'm still mad that my tax dollars are supporting a non-profit entity for dogs rather than red-cross. "

wildthing wrote on Jul 21, 2009 2:51 PM:

" Melmel128: Mental issues? If that's the case then they need help. There but for the grace of God goes you. "

nouveaudebut wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:13 PM:

" These men made the wrong choice to continue working without the necessary resources to follow protocol. That is the crime. Management's crime. "

nouveaudebut wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:11 PM:

" traveler: I suppose you would say the same for a murder trial? Not court appointed by choice.
Only civil cases for traveler? Get real. "

nouveaudebut wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:09 PM:

" melmel: The only mental issues they had was getting the job done when management wouldn't supply adequate resources. Euthanize quickly or work somewhere else. The equipment was not sufficient for them to follow protocol. "

nouveaudebut wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:05 PM:

" County did not supply adequate resources to do the job, but expected them to dispose of thousands of animals quickly. They complained, but "just do it". "

traveler wrote on Jul 19, 2009 12:19 PM:

" in cases like this, it is a shame that our country does not follow the laws of Hammurabi.I hope that those attorneys were court appointed and are not representing those men by choice. "

melmel128 wrote on Jul 19, 2009 10:25 AM:

" I am pleased that those responsible for this cruelty toward innocent animals are facing charges. These men have mental issues. Hopefully they will have to serve time and can think about what they did. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News