* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• CLAFLIN v. CRIME: Lab puts science in hands of police
• CHARLESTON PORT: Lifeblood of local industries
• SCOUTING CENTENNIAL: Turning boys into men
• PHOTO GALLERY: Page Turner 2010
• VIDEO: Peanut butter for charity

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Senate probe: S.C. gov broke law on state travel

By BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE, The Associated Press  Monday, August 10, 2009

22 comment(s) | Default | Large

WASHINGTON (AP) — South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford broke state law when he charged taxpayers for more expensive business and first-class flights, according to the chairman of the legislative committee investigating Sanford’s international travel.

State Sen. David Thomas, whose budget committee investigated Sanford’s flights following reports last month by The Associated Press, sent evidence to Senate leaders Monday arguing the Republican governor violated state laws requiring the cheapest travel possible.

Thomas said Sanford’s more expensive flights on two state Commerce Department trips cost taxpayers $13,700 more than the economy class flights available.

Legislators can consider sanctions against Sanford ranging from demanding reimbursement to impeachment, said Thomas, R-Fountain Inn.

“It could be perceived, if it’s significant enough and a case can be made of it, to constitute a case for possible impeachment,” Thomas said Monday.

Sanford spokesman Benjamin Fox said Thomas’ conclusions that the governor broke the law “blatantly overreach and accordingly are, in our view, not correct.”

“Before making his claims, it would have seemed fair for Senator Thomas to actually approach our office, as well as the Department of Commerce, to discuss his evidence and his interpretation of state laws and regulations,” Fox said in a statement.

Sanford, 49, has been under increased scrutiny since admitting in June to having a mistress in Argentina. He’s vowed to stay in office and says he is trying to reconcile with his wife, who has moved out of the governor’s official residence to live at the family’s beach house with their sons.

Thomas, who has announced his candidacy for Congress, said the budget subcommittee that he chairs also will investigate Sanford’s use of state planes and report those findings later to lawmakers. The AP reported this week that Sanford used state aircraft for personal and political trips, a practice that is contrary to state law.

Democratic state Sen. Vincent Sheheen of Camden and Democratic Rep. Boyd Brown of Winnsboro called for an investigation Monday.

Sanford’s staff has defended his use of the planes, saying he always traveled on state business and used the planes less frequently than his predecessors.

Thomas said he didn’t believe a single issue, including violating state law to travel business and first class, would trigger an impeachment process. Legislators likely would consider a combination of concerns, including Sanford’s business and first-class travel at state expense, use of state planes for personal and political trips and his mysterious disappearance earlier this year to visit his mistress in Argentina.

“It’s the whole array of all the things that we’ve seen over the past month,” said Thomas, who said he wasn’t advocating impeachment or other sanctions. Thomas said he will not make any recommendation when submitting his findings to the Legislature, but only will present evidence to lawmakers for review.

“They could do nothing,” he said.

Last month the AP reported that Sanford, who once criticized other state officials for costly travel, charged the state more than $37,600 for first-class and business-class flights overseas since November 2005 despite a state law requiring lowest-cost travel.

Thomas, chairman of the Constitutional and Administrative Subcommittee of Senate Finance, conducted his own investigation of the AP’s findings, focusing on state trips Sanford took to China in 2007 and London in 2006.

Sanford’s $12,172 charge for travel to China included business-class accommodations on United Airlines. The governor also flew in first class on a U.S. Airways flight to London in 2006 at a cost of $7,065, state records show.

Thomas said there is no documentation showing that the governor or anyone else reimbursed the state for the more expensive flights. Other state employees traveled in the less expensive economy class on those flights, he said.

The AP reported on two other flights Sanford took to Munich and Poland, charging the state nearly $10,000 for business class seats on those trips. Thomas said he has not received information from the state on those flights, so they are not included in his report.

Sanford charged the state $8,687 for a Delta Air Lines trip to Brazil last year that included a leg in the more expensive business class, state expense records show. He has since acknowledged visiting his mistress in Argentina during that trip, a trade mission planned by the state’s Commerce Department. After the publicity in June, Sanford reimbursed the state $3,300 for part of the trip.

Other state employees spent less than $2,000 each on economy seats for the Brazil flight, according to state records.

Thomas said that trip is not included in his findings because Sanford reimbursed the state, although he may later refer it to Senate leaders as a separate violation.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
22 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

edisto1993 wrote on Aug 18, 2009 2:08 PM:

" Should of all this coming, when a man doesn't support public education, does he care about his state?? Easy answer NO (cares about where his next financial supporter will come from) "

rump wrote on Aug 17, 2009 2:35 PM:

" I hate to pop one's bubble. But Sanford is not a potential candidate!!!!!!!!!!!
He can not run in 2010!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I myselfWantClyburnToResignHisCongressionalSeatImmediatelyAndRunForGovernor. "

TAS wrote on Aug 17, 2009 10:32 AM:

" rump, why do we have to have either? Are these two the only individuals capable of leading SC?You implying that they are doesn't say much for the other potential candidates. Both really sucks. "

bravo14sc wrote on Aug 15, 2009 10:44 PM:

" A politician abuses his power for his own interests. A statesman diverts his power for the good of the people. We need more statesmen and fewer politicians. This scandal disqualifies this politician. "

rump wrote on Aug 15, 2009 9:45 PM:

" I would rather have Sanford w/ 100 women than Andre Bauer w/ one..
ButLikeIsaidFromTheBeginning. WeHavePrecedence!
ImpeachSanfordinTheHouse. Let theSenate deny it.
ItWorked for Clinton. ItWillWork for Sanfrod. "

TAS wrote on Aug 15, 2009 8:12 AM:

" Let the voting begin..and if the people want Andre Bauer,let's have Andre Bauer.Won't be the 1st time we trade one a%#hole for another one.SC has gotten good at picking losers lately don't you think? "

rump wrote on Aug 14, 2009 3:51 PM:

" You might have Andre Bauer! Good luck with HIM!!!!!!!! "

TAS wrote on Aug 13, 2009 3:57 PM:

" I asked for another governor too, but I didn't get that either.Ain't life a B$tc#? "

rump wrote on Aug 13, 2009 3:37 PM:

" All I asked was for, was one word. A yes or a no. "

TAS wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:49 AM:

" rump, I don't remember what I felt 12 years ago about most things. However, I had the same values then as I do now and I repeat, WRONG IS WRONG! Sorry, couldn't do one word. "

rump wrote on Aug 12, 2009 10:01 PM:

" TAS Were you saying the same thing about Clinton 12 years ago? YES No
It is a simple question. Just one word. "

captivated wrote on Aug 12, 2009 12:08 PM:

" His own wife didn't trust him, which is why she stepped off. Go away, Mark! "

agape wrote on Aug 11, 2009 8:10 PM:

" Sanford needs to lose the ego and do whats best for the state of South Carolina. Step Down. How can we trust him? His character has been damaged. "

TAS wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:51 PM:

" Why ain't I surprised you got it twisted as usual Annual?Birds of a feather(you & confisus_sum) always flock together.REPEATING:Wrong is wrong and I could never condone such behavior no matter my political views. "

wagreen1 wrote on Aug 11, 2009 2:46 PM:

" This governor needs to step down. As long as S.C. keeps electing these hypocrits,majority republicans we will continue to be the laughing stock of the nation "

confisus_sum wrote on Aug 11, 2009 2:10 PM:

" So asking for accountability from all politicians and state employees is stupid? Apparently you cannot rise above party affiliation, or job classification. What is good for one is good for all. "

ANNUAL wrote on Aug 11, 2009 1:47 PM:

" TAS so your saying not to review all state employees travel plans and places they stay or just to select a certain few to review. "

TAS wrote on Aug 11, 2009 12:32 PM:

" confisus_sum you are as sad as Sanford is. Wrong is wrong and I could never condone such behavior no matter my political views. How about get off stupid and start making sense here. "

confisus_sum wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:40 AM:

" Okay...but make sure you evaluate EVERY state employee's travel plans from now on. Have you ever seen the hotels they stay in during conferences? "

TAS wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:37 AM:

" How much more do we have to endue people? Keep em laughing Spud "Original Party Animal" Sanford. "

nicole29 wrote on Aug 11, 2009 8:16 AM:

" Im agree with you 100%. "

captivated wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:28 AM:

" Would somebody please IMPEACH this man already!?!?! "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.





More News