* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Feds sue business, claiming religious discrimination

By DIONNE GLEATON, T&D Staff Writer  Monday, September 28, 2009

6 comment(s) | Default | Large

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed a religious discrimination lawsuit against a Bowman-based ambulance service, alleging it illegally terminated an employee based on her religion.

Community Transport Services LLC, private ambulance service that served Orangeburg, Bamberg, Calhoun, Clarendon and Dorchester counties, is the subject of the lawsuit. It reportedly merged with another company in 2007. That company is not named in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit claims former emergency medical technician Dale Morant was fired in 2006 after she refused to participate in a Halloween carnival held at Prince of Orange Mall.

The lawsuit was filed Sept. 10 in U.S. District Court and claims that as a Jehovah's Witness, Morant does not celebrate Halloween.

The lawsuit claims Community Transport Services "engaged in unlawful employment practices ... by failing to provide Ms. Morant a reasonable accommodation of her religious beliefs and practices and by discharging her because of her religious beliefs and practices."

EEOC attorney Lynette Barnes said, "A Jehovah's Witness belief is that they don't celebrate any type of celebrations, including birthdays and holidays such as Halloween. They can't even attend those kinds of events. Basically, what Community Transport was requiring was that she go to a Halloween carnival ... and be there as a representative of the company and hand out materials. But because it was a Halloween celebration, that violated her religious beliefs.

"An employer can't force anybody to do anything, but they can make (it) a requirement of their jobs that an employee participate in certain events. If she had not had religious objection, certainly during this hour of your work day there was nothing wrong with (attending the carnival). But she just could not do it because it violated her religious belief."

The service may no longer be in operation. The phone number for the person listed as the company's registered agent with the S.C. Secretary of State's Office was no longer in service.

"If they have dissolved, they did not notify the Secretary of State's Office. As to what we can see right now, I would assume that they are still in business," said Renee Daggerhart, media relations director at the state Secretary of State's Office

Charles Dixon, manager of American Heritage Ambulance, a private ambulance service in Orangeburg, said Community Transport Services merged with their Ladson-based American Heritage Ambulance in November 2007.

"They are no longer in business under that name. There was a merger with American Heritage Ambulance," he said, noting that Cindy Burbage, owner of American Heritage Ambulance, is not involved in the lawsuit.

Barnes said while Community Transport Services may no longer be in operation, its previous owner is still not exempt from the law.

"Technically, a company isn't the building, cars and the people. It's the owners. So, if any owner or owners of a company engage in something that violates the law, the fact they shut down doesn't make them any less liable. Discrimination occurred. This woman lost her job, and the fact that the company decided to close up doesn't mean she's not entitled to whatever damages she might have as a result," Barnes said.

She said a voluntary settlement could not be reached, prompting the EEOC to ultimately file the lawsuit.

"We now have to wait for the company to contact us or file an answer to the lawsuit. The company will have to respond to the lawsuit, and then we just move forward based on the rules of the court," she said.

Barnes added, "We see this type of issue come up most often when an employer has a Saturday work rule with working overtime on Saturday. Quite a few religious denominations believe that Saturday is Sabbath and can't work on Saturday. We see this kind of conflict come up quite a bit, but it's just unusual that this happens to be a Halloween carnival at a mall."

n

T&D Staff Writer Dionne Gleaton can be reached by e-mail at dgleaton@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-533-5534. Discuss this and other stories online at TheTandD.com.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
6 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

wbwjr wrote on Sep 30, 2009 9:39 AM:

" She should have know that this comes with the job.When you take a
public service job religion must not be used as an excuse to not do the job. "

voicereason wrote on Sep 29, 2009 8:14 AM:

" The Watchtower Society is rich like Scientology.

Jehovah's Witnesses are litigious ,unfortunately they discriminate harshly against any fellow JW member who dissents against their own Watchtower teachings.
They don't play well with others. "

orangeburger wrote on Sep 28, 2009 8:33 PM:

" My religion prohibits me from working, paying interest..etc. Who will cut me slack? I hope they don't make this a big race issue..It is lack of motivation- plain and simple. "

tim132000 wrote on Sep 28, 2009 5:31 PM:

" i went to the web site listed and it sure does look like the JW'S like to sue, looks to me like they want a free ride "

JJ2014 wrote on Sep 28, 2009 7:58 AM:

" The following website summarizes over 500 lawsuits filed by Jehovah's Witnesses against their Employers, incidents involving problem JW Employees, etc:

EMPLOYMENT ISSUES UNIQUE TO JEHOVAH'S WITNESS EMPLOYEES

jwemployees.bravehost.com "

DannyHaszard wrote on Sep 28, 2009 6:36 AM:

" Jehovah's Witnesses are most litigious(sue happy).The oppressive Watchtower organization of Jehovah's Witnesses does NOT extend these same freedom rights that they demand and litigate,to their own followers. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News