* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• CLAFLIN v. CRIME: Lab puts science in hands of police
• CHARLESTON PORT: Lifeblood of local industries
• SCOUTING CENTENNIAL: Turning boys into men
• PHOTO GALLERY: Page Turner 2010
• VIDEO: Peanut butter for charity

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Court overturns $27 million DUI verdict

By LEE TANT, T&D Staff Writer  Monday, October 05, 2009

Leave a Comment | Default | Large

The state Supreme Court has overturned a $27 million judgment awarded to a Denmark man who was paralyzed during a car accident in April 2000.

Texaco, Inc. and Anderson Oil Company are not liable for the injuries Louis M. Jamison sustained in the accident, the court decided. The court also said the Mini Mart in Denmark should get a new trial.

Attorneys for Louis M. Jamison claimed the convenience store sold alcohol to his underage cousin, 19, who died in the accident. According to court documents, the cousin allegedly became intoxicated from beer he bought from the station and was driving during the one-car accident that led to Jamison, who was then 17, becoming a quadriplegic.

A Blackville male also died just hours after the crash. Two other men were hospitalized.

The court ruled on Sept. 21 that Texaco and Anderson, a company that provides gas to Texaco stations, didn't control Mini Mart's day-to-day operations, including whether the station sold alcohol.

Charleston attorney Bobby Hood, the lead counsel for Texaco, says the decision stopped a dangerous precedent from being established in the Palmetto State. Had the court upheld the April 2006 verdict against Texaco, Hood believes franchises would be reluctant to do business here because of the higher liability standards.

"That kind of business relationship just can't work," he said. "It's an important case."

Hood said the decision puts South Carolina in step with most other states with regard to franchise liability.

Hood said the case drew concern from across the nation. Law firms in Washington, New York and Houston submitted briefs to the court.

Richard Rosen, Jamison's lead attorney, said, "This was a terrible tragedy. We will ask the court to reconsider its decision."

The justices decided the case against Mini Mart should go back to trial because results from a blood sample deemed unreliable were discussed during the trial.

The sample was taken at Richland Memorial Hospital prior to the driver's death. However, that sample wasn't tested for alcohol there, according to court documents. It was turned over to Richland County Coroner's Office two days after the accident. The State Law Enforcement Division received and tested the sample a day later at the request of an officer investigating the case.

The SLED test found the driver's blood alcohol level to be 0.168, more than double the legal limit.

During the trial, an expert witness estimated the driver's blood alcohol level was 0.193 when he crashed based on the SLED findings.

Justices said the fact that multiple agencies handled the sample brought its reliability into question. They also believed the witness's inadmissible testimony likely influenced the jury to side with Jamison.

The court also ruled against dismissing Mini Mart part-owner John Morris from the case. Morris contended his son, Kevin, had brought out his shares of the station in 1992. But justices noted his attorneys didn't bring that up at the original trial, which rendered that assertion useless for the appeal.

n

T&D Staff Writer Lee Tant can be reached by e-mail at ltant@timesanddemocrat.com or by phone at 803-534-1060. Discuss this and other stories online at TheTandD.com.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
Leave a Comment
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News