* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• GOVERNOR'S RACE: News & candidate info
• PET CORNER: Your home for news & PET IDOL
• DOWN ON THE FARM: News, videos and more
• SWINE FLU: News & info
• T&D DATATRACK: In-depth news and reports

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

County official says town's failure to meet deadline delayed election

By MARTHA ROSE BROWN, T&D Correspondent  Saturday, November 07, 2009

Leave a Comment | Default | Large

SANTEE – Santee Mayor Silas Seabrooks said Friday he isn’t sure why tow officials did not respond in a timely manner to the Orangeburg County Election Commission’s request to resubmit an amended ordinance that would’ve allowed Santee to hold an election on Nov. 3.

“Something must have fallen through the cracks,” Seabrooks said.

As a result, three seats – mayor and two at-large council members – will be up for election in April 2010. If town officials had responded to the County Election Commission’s request promptly, Santee would have held an election Tuesday like many other towns across The Times and Democrat Region.

Howard Jackson, Orangeburg County Voter Registration and Election director, said Santee officials sent an ordinance to the County Election Commission requesting a transfer of responsibility for Santee elections to the county.

“Our Commission added some changes to the ordinance, and we gave it back to the town,” Jackson said, nothing the Election Commission did not agree with the town’s request and proceeded to ask Santee officials to resubmit the ordinance with appropriate changes that would allow voters to cast ballots on Nov. 3.

He said Santee had about 60 days, or until around July 24, to respond. But Jackson said the county did not receive a response from the town in time.

Jackson said Santee officials wanted the county to handle its elections and wanted to dissolve its municipal election commission. He said it was the decision of the County Election Commission not to honor Santee’s request.

“We are not doing it for any others,” Jackson said. “We wanted to be consistent.”

Both Seabrooks and Santee Town Administrator Jason Purvis said William Johnson, town attorney, had been in communication with Jackson concerning the handling of Santee’s elections.

Johnson told The T&D he knows that Santee Town Council’s desire is to let the County Election Commission handle the town’s elections and he will be working to ensure that goal is met.

The T&D asked Johnson about correspondence he’s had with the town concerning the transfer of authority over its elections to the County Elections Commission, but he cited attorney-client privilege, declining to comment.

T&D Correspondent Martha Rose Brown can be reached by e-mail at marfawose@aol.com. T&D Staff Writer Gene Zaleski also contributed to this report.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
Leave a Comment
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More News