* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• CLAFLIN v. CRIME: Lab puts science in hands of police
• CHARLESTON PORT: Lifeblood of local industries
• SCOUTING CENTENNIAL: Turning boys into men
• PHOTO GALLERY: Page Turner 2010
• VIDEO: Peanut butter for charity

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Background checks needed on teacher subs

 Sunday, November 15, 2009

1 comment(s) | Default | Large

THE ISSUE: Background checks for substitute teachers

OUR OPINION: Legislature should make change in law

Background checks on potential employees have become as routine as drug testing. A criminal background check, however, is not a requirement for substitute teachers in South Carolina. That can and should change.

The State Board of Education has decided to support changing state law to require school districts to state criminal background checks on substitutes.

Current law requires background checks only on full-time certified teachers. In a unanimous vote, the State Board voiced its support for legislative action that would require substitutes to be screened by the State Law Enforcement Division.

State Superintendent of Education Jim Rex said that based on informal surveys conducted by his agency, most school districts are already doing SLED background checks on substitute teachers. Some pay for the checks out of district funds, while others require prospective subs to pay as a condition of employment.

“Essentially, the State Board wants the General Assembly to make a strong statement and make these background checks a requirement,” Rex said. “You can’t put too much emphasis on student safety.”

The State Board resolution proposed that SLED charge school districts no more than the amount it charges charitable organizations for criminal background checks. Currently, that’s $8.

The board also recommended that the Education Department provide training designed to help local school district personnel better understand the items found in SLED reports so that this information could be used more effectively when hiring substitutes.

“We hope this sends a strong signal to school districts concerning the importance of establishing and enforcing tight screening criteria for substitute teachers,” State Board Chair Tim Moore said.

State Board member Cindy Clark was a key supporter of the resolution. “These changes in state law would help ensure the safety of our students, which is an important goal of the board,” Clark said.

Tightening the vetting process for substitute teachers is part of Rex’s focus on a heightened culture of safety and security in South Carolina schools. Over the past two years, he has forged a partnership with Darkness to Light, a Charleston-based nonprofit organization that by year’s end will train 20,000 South Carolina teachers and school employees in child abuse prevention.

That’s more than 40 percent of the state’s 54,000 professional school staff and sets a national record among American school systems, according to Darkness to Light.

By the end of 2010, Rex anticipates that more than 38,000 education staff will complete the training – about 75 percent of the state’s professional school work force.

While such training of regular personnel is important, it is essential that those who are called up as substitute teachers are properly vetted also. The Legislature should make a sensible change in the law.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
1 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

clarke g wrote on Nov 15, 2009 1:43 PM:

" It is about time. Now could we please do random drug screening of all school employees?
Including the bus drivers and the coaches? "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More Opinion