* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• CLAFLIN v. CRIME: Lab puts science in hands of police
• CHARLESTON PORT: Lifeblood of local industries
• SCOUTING CENTENNIAL: Turning boys into men
• PHOTO GALLERY: Page Turner 2010
• VIDEO: Peanut butter for charity

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Are we asking too much?

 Saturday, November 21, 2009

64 comment(s) | Default | Large

While relaxing Sunday evening, contemplating how the Senate would vote on the upcoming health care legislation, I was overwhelmed by a multitude of self-imposed questions.

“Can we, the people of America, realistically expect a senator who has never been without adequate health insurance to be sympathetic to the medical needs of those of who lack coverage?”

“Can our designees be so far removed from the realities in the lives of average people that they have totally lost compassion for their fellow man?”

“Does party loyalty have preference over the promises that were made to your constituents?”

”Should the needs of many be sacrificed to further enrich the treasures of the elite?”

“Can the American public be assured that possibly the most important piece of legislation since the civil rights era will be given the thorough consideration that is due?”

These and other tough questions ought to be asked of the people we have delegated to be the overseers of our well-being and the monitors of our medical system. Ensuring health care coverage for all Americans is a matter that has been ignored for too long and demands immediate attention from our statesmen in Washington .

Some of our representatives in Washington appear to be indifferent to the needs of those who lack sufficient health coverage. Asking them to evaluate the state of health care in America is equivalent to asking the fox whether the fence that protects the chickens is too low. They have been content on taking a lackadaisical approach — a wait-and-see attitude — for the insurance industry to self-medicate the deficiencies that are prevalent in our current health care system. You cannot expect a for-profit institution to be the rectifier of its own imperfections.

Furthermore, “Can the gentleman from the South truly understand the plight of the pregnant, unwed mother that lives in one of the urban ghettos of the North?”

“Will the senator from the North have compassion for the uneducated, elderly farm worker in the South who lacks insurance?”

“What will happen to the kind-hearted grandmother in need of heart surgery who has a history of cardiac problems?”

“Does anyone really care?”

Our lawmakers have to mentally and empathetically exchange positions with the citizens they represent in these situations and take an analytical and realistic look at the dilemmas that face the less fortunate. A walk in another person’s shoes sometimes reveals sobering realities.

Commitment to one’s party has been a part of the political landscape since its inception and probably will continue to exist eternally. However, too many of our representatives have opted to be mere followers, content to rubber stamp the wishes of an elite few. Great men tend to act independently of others, preferring to do what is right for the majority vs. what is popular with the minority.

America can ill afford to put the well-being of citizens solely in the hands of the health care industry and depend on them to do what is right? Historically they have exhibited an inability to be considerate of the needs of those who are medically impaired or lack sufficient health coverage. We, the constituents, cannot be guaranteed that health interests will do what is necessary to provide inexpensive coverage for all. A government option will ensure that affordable universal health care will be obtainable for everyone.

Our senators will soon vote on landmark legislation targeted at ensuring that all the people are entitled to the care and attention that is due to residents of this great nation. Approval of this bill will show that we do indeed have compassion and benevolence for those that are truly in need.

“Are we asking too much of our representatives?”

The answer is an unequivocal “no.” The burden of revamping health care has been put on the shoulders of the people we elected to act on our behalf and we expect them to fervently pursue the timely resolution of this lingering matter. As our representatives, they are obligated to work toward achieving a solution that is both realistic and attainable. We, the American voters, expect the measure to be debated with the prudence of sages because it affects the future well-being of millions of deserving citizens. We implore that the senators to have the decency to independently assess the health care needs of America and finally eradicate the anguish of your constituents from being inadequately insured in America.

— Harold Thomas, Orangeburg

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
64 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 27, 2009 10:51 PM:

" Classy, now you are talking sense. Let's stick to the facts if we can find them and may the best information and rationale win. Looking forward to it. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 27, 2009 7:42 PM:

" Debut..sounds like you're making an assumption. Clearly our views are different which makes for good debates. Campaign rhetoric really? Surely we will spar again in the future,nothing like a good political debate. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 26, 2009 9:28 AM:

" Classy, you are relying on a continuation of campaign rhetoric instead of reading the links I provided. If you won't read them, then nothing I say matters. Good Life to you. "

rump wrote on Nov 25, 2009 8:33 PM:

" Why all the fuss? There jobs abundant in South Carolina's 7th Congressional District. They also come with 100% medical benefits. So sayeth
Congress and the Administration. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 25, 2009 4:34 PM:

" I believe in going straight to the source. http://www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/index.php The facts from a man that strategically, not haphazardly won the election to be OUR U.S. PRESIDENT. Hard pill to swallow for some!! "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 25, 2009 3:57 PM:

" Debut..troubled economy yes..the boat's sinking! caused by holes from previous administrations, so lets just stay on it and perish cause the Obama administration can't possibly save it? It ain't from the lack of trying! "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 25, 2009 3:40 PM:

" According to DOL healthcare jobs are projected to increase by 27.3% in comparison to 14% in other industries combined. With a sturdy increase for future years. Where does the lack of staffing come in? "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 25, 2009 12:31 AM:

" Classy, FYI: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15487676/ns/health-health_care/page/2/ "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 25, 2009 12:15 AM:

" Classy, good find on the 80% uninsured dying in the ER. http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1786943/uninsured_trauma_patients_more_likely_to_die_in_er/index.html
That report is very troubling, but if the bill passes, the waits will be longer for lack of staffing. Your call... "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 25, 2009 12:09 AM:

" Well Classy, your wait in the ER will only get much worse if the bill is passed according to this source: http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/06/er-crowding-and-your-risk-of-dying-from-a-heart-attack.html
Check it out... you may wish to reconsider your position. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 25, 2009 12:04 AM:

" Classy, there ARE pros and cons, but the cons of adding trillions to the deficit and government control across the board far outweigh the pros. If the bill passes, 18 million won't be insured. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 25, 2009 12:02 AM:

" Classy, your statement on Resources is bogus. Go here to see the real dismal picture from the CBO:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10297/SummaryforWeb_LTBO.pdf
This summary is without benefit of the Senate Health Bill. We are in trouble economically! "

rump wrote on Nov 24, 2009 5:10 PM:

" All the jobs in South Carolina's 7th Congressional District have 100% medical benefits according to the current administration. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:15 PM:

" Debut..there are pros and cons in everything especially this bill. In this case it is necessary to give up some things to gain others that will benefit the majority of deserving American. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 24, 2009 3:52 PM:

" sic&tyrd..yes,insured and uninsured have to wait in ER. However,research shows that uninsured have 80% higher risks of dying. Obviously waiting is not the issue. Doing some research my help your point. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 24, 2009 3:11 PM:

" Confisus_sum..America is the richest country in the world but is unable to provide the resources??? Bush WANTED to engage in war and America magically found the resources for that.
There ARE plenty hidden resources. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 24, 2009 2:57 PM:

" Debut..my education on this comes from having experienced the pure agony of waiting in ER for hours and hours. Something people with insurance can't even imagine. Accepted media education is for the politically unsavvy. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:03 PM:

" Confusis makes a good point; you don't replace a troubled system with one that is inherently more expensive and controlling just to say "something" has been done. Let's see what develops in the Senate. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 1:00 PM:

" Sic&Tyrd, one more thing, few are taking the time to read the bills before the House & the Senate. They rely on others to tell them what the truth is. I won't be quiet... "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 12:57 PM:

" Sic&Tyrd, thanks for the suggestion, but first I'm not a smart-a**. I believe that people need to know the truth. Not a filibuster here either... k's read this but only that... no comment from them. "

confisus_sum wrote on Nov 24, 2009 8:55 AM:

" classy: You say stick to the facts then proceed to promote your own personal opinion. Because there is a WANT does not mean there are the resources to supply it. "

sic&tyrd wrote on Nov 24, 2009 5:50 AM:

" ND, chill out with the filibuster... Although I agree with you, you make people ill because you're a smarta$$. And cbb, people with or without insurance have to wait in the emergency room. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:14 AM:

" By the way ClassyBoomer, I hope you bring some coffee when you read this bill, because it is 2074 pages long and quite tedious. If you refuse to read it, then don't discuss it. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:10 AM:

" Classy, compassion is indeed a motivating factor in selling this bill, but it masks the pain and misery that it will surely plunge our country into financially and personally. You will suffer with us all. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:08 AM:

" Classy, can you tell the readers what in Mr. Thomas's editorial that convinced you that he was correct in what he assumed, presumed, to be factual? We need to know to rebut, if necessary. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:05 AM:

" Rump, forget the 100%. There will be approximately 6 million who will miss this plane. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:04 AM:

" Confisus_sum, you are indeed correct in your assumptions. It's as though one were a disciple of Madoff, believing what he was told without knowing the details of the scheme. Disaster in the end. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 3:59 AM:

" Classy, there are horror stories out there where you wait an inordinate amount of time at the ER, but Universal Health care recipients in other countries wait "months" for the care they need. Comment? "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 3:56 AM:

" Classy, if you haven't read the Senate Bill (H.R.3590), you should do it here: http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/11/18/hcbill.pdf
Make sure you have .pdf on your system. Once read, come back and let's talk about the issues raised. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 24, 2009 3:53 AM:

" Classy, first shelve your emotions and let's stick to the facts. What have you read that causes you to support this bill? Are you relying on the media to educate you? "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 23, 2009 4:45 PM:

" Debut..sticking to the facts of the matter! THIS HEALTHCARE REFORM BILL NEEDS TO BE PASSED for the future health of those that will one day run this country when we both are gone. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 23, 2009 4:39 PM:

" Debut..compassion is not what you have displayed. I read it like I see it. And I am more than willing to have an intelligent discourse on this and other subjects. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 23, 2009 4:34 PM:

" Debut..a comment that says uninsured have healthcare through health professionals at the ER indicates to me that you don't see a problem with a SICK person waiting 8 plus hours for care. "

confisus_sum wrote on Nov 23, 2009 3:17 PM:

" Truly amazing to find that those that support this bill have never read it, while those that are against it have. Blind allegiance to political affiliation is just plain ignorant. "

rump wrote on Nov 23, 2009 2:42 PM:

" I still want to know what happened to the 100%?? "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 23, 2009 1:46 PM:

" Classy, again I do not have a cold heart, so if you would like to have an intelligent discourse on this and other issues, let me know. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 23, 2009 1:43 PM:

" Classy, I do my research on these issues, so ignorance on my part is not the result. If you read the bill and then reread Mr. Thomas editorial you may think differently. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 23, 2009 1:40 PM:

" Classy, your responses indicate that the nuts & bolts of the issues are of no importance to you. Questions peel the veneer revealing the truth that matters. A bad bill is worse than no bill. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 23, 2009 1:36 PM:

" Classy, Mr. Thomas indicated that Senators have always had insurance, so you miss the point with my comments. Senators had other lives before becoming Senators. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 23, 2009 12:58 PM:

" Debut..what really is IGNORANT and DANGEROUS is Americans that think like you and don't even care about the mess that will result and have already resulted from narrow mindedness. Hint,previous administration in office. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 23, 2009 12:49 PM:

" Debut..If you are an elected official elected by your constituents, your past life should not prevent you from doing what you were elected to do. 40 years ago means nothing! what about NOW??????????????? "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 23, 2009 12:43 PM:

" Debut..I hope you NEVER need something important that will affect your quality of life and I hope that if you do, someone with a cold heart like yours will keep you from getting it. "

classybabyboomer wrote on Nov 22, 2009 4:41 PM:

" Well said Mr.Thomas. I as an American Citzen expect those that my vote help elect to do their JOBS!! It's way past time that they start earning their pay. Responsibility cost more than money. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 2:10 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, chances are that this bill will become law in some form. When it does and the health care system along with our freedom to choose crumbles, you will someday ask "Why". Just remember. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 2:07 PM:

" For the first time in our history we see bills being passed that haven't been read by those voting. This is ignorant and dangerous, but it has been allowed. This behavior must change. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 2:04 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, the rush to push this bill through is ludicrous. Do you submit an ill conceived bill just because "something" has to be done? Someone will always be without insurance. That's a fact. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 2:01 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, our Representatives are not listening to anything that we are asking to date. Cross the aisle debate is not happening. Intelligent discourse is absent. Reading the bill in not happening. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:58 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, compassion and benevolence is the "smoke" of this bill and not the real motive behind it. List the plus's and the negatives side by side and your eyes will become open. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:56 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, passage of this bill will show that those in power ignore the massive amount of jobs that will move overseas, the doubling and tripling of the deficit, ignoring the will of Americans. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:53 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, no one knows what the government option is finally going to be since the Dems have held their meetings in secret. The option is Unconstitutional as previously defined. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:51 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, maybe you should define what "Government Option" means to you. With that option, the people who need the coverage most will still not be able to afford it, being fined instead. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:42 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, it is naive to think that companies will ignore the bottom line in favor of the public, unless ignoring them is bad for that bottom line (profits). "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:37 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, you are correct concerning Rubber Stamping Politicians and what defines a Great Man. We have Great Women also. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:35 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, empathy and exchanging positions is not the problem. Agendas that block meaningful legislation over the years and pass inefficient bills is the problem. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:33 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, "Does anyone really care", is insulting to many Americans as well as politicians. Most care but are not in a position of power to make things happen. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:32 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, North, South, East, West; examples of what you write exist in all those locations. Your question about Grandma exists all over this country. We currently have the best quality care in the world. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:26 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, you make the insurance industry the culprit here. Tort reform and cross state competition would force the industry to provide better rates for insurance for starters. Legislators continue to ignore that. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:23 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, ensuring coverage for all Americans? Do you believe that the government should transform our country into a Welfare State, providing everything for all? "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:19 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, in what fashion do you believe that the Senate is the "Overseers" of our well being? Is it not each persons responsibility to ensure their own well being? "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:16 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, I doubt that this legislation is the most important since the Civil Rights era, but it is assuredly the most screwed up with respect to validity and transparency. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:14 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, 4th question; Who are the many? The "many" already have health insurance or chose not have it. The "Few" is what this bill is all about when you talk about numbers. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:08 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, 2nd question; I'm sure that some are not compassionate; not much different than many of the average citizens of this country. It's a mix, and the more you have, the less you give. "

NouveauDebut wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:05 PM:

" Mr. Thomas, your first question; Senators were not always Senators. They DO have a past, and not all lived in the lap of luxury. How many had health insurance 40 years ago? "

rump wrote on Nov 21, 2009 5:49 PM:

" It is truly hilarious!! Today 88% of Americans have HealthInsurance!!
With This bill 94% will have it!!
What happened to 100%??????? "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More Opinion